Subject: Fwd: Dynamic Chamber Intake manifolds
From: "Perry Mick" <>
Date: 2/6/1999, 5:19 PM
To: perrym@teleport.com




Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1999 01:48:10 -0800
From: Paul <rotaryeng@earthlink.net>
To: z <rotaryeng@earthlink.net>
Subject: Dynamic Chamber Intake manifolds

Archie Frangoudis wrote:

Just a quick note on velocity. (piston engines)
Lycoming 0-200 +AD0- By raising and radiusing the intake port, and
using a smaller exhaust valve, velocity increased on the flow bench, 
and
proved itself in formula racing.

Automotive racing +AD0- Bigger is not necessarily better. Ex: On the 
large port
390 - 427 type Fords,
we brazed the lower portion of the exhaust ports, and epoxied the 
Intakes,
reducing the cross-section and improving airflow.

Proving that no matter how large a funnel is placed over your nose and
mouth, the volume of air taken in is dictated by the size of one's 
lungs.
(barring a restricted throat)
+ACI-D+ACI- shaped exhaust ports are working better with a short turn 
radius
pipe.(normally aspirated).

I realize that this has nothing to do with rotaries........ or does 
it?
Would appreciate commentary and/or experiences.
Rotary neophyte Archie

The Aircraft Rotary Engine Newsletter.              Powered by Linux.

http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/            http://www.linux.org


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com