X-Mozilla-Keys:
Marc Pedings wrote:
Paul wrote:
I used to believe the Marcotte two inch offset upward was beneficial for
the prop shaft but now I think it is a drawback for most airplanes. It
results in less room for one rad under the engine. I also believe that
with
careful design a planetary can be made lighter for a given torque
capability.
Paul Lamar
Yes, I have been looking at the Marcotte drive too. The final weight for the new
13B 'adapter housing' and the M-200VP re-drive itself totals 46 lbs. (actual
quote). I was impressed with the design myself, but the offset and additional
weight is not worth it in my case.
Marc Pedings
The Aircraft Rotary Engine Newsletter. Powered by Linux.
http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/ http://www.linux.org