Subject: Rotary vs Boinger BSFC
From: Paul
Date: 10/1/1999, 1:08 PM
To: zz

X-Mozilla-Keys:                                                                                 
Wschertz@aol.com wrote:

In a message dated 9/30/99 16:25:11, Zachary Carter wrote:

All
else being equal (exhaust and intake port timing and such), the rotary
engine cycle actually is more efficient than the carnot cycle, a piston
engine with an exhaust port timing similar to a rotary's would have
significantly lower fuel efficiency.


Whoops, can't let this pass.  You certainly don't mean more efficient than
the CARNOT cycle, since the carnot cycle is the thermodynamic limit for a
heat engine of any type.
Bill Schertz


The Aircraft Rotary Engine Newsletter.              Powered by Linux.

http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/            http://www.linux.org