Al Gietzen wrote:
They need a 1/2 inch plate, Al. Not 3/8 and the load rating radial is only
about 3/4 of what it is axially. What load rating did you buy?
I assumed 3/8" because the groove is 3/8, but I can see it would be better
if there was some more compression there.
My engine is basically supported at the four 'corners'; but the rear (pusher
config) will take a heavier gravity load than the front because of re-drive
and prop. I've got the 90# radial - 240 axial at the front, and the 165
radial - 380 axial for the rear. If I find these too soft, I'll move the
rears to the front, and get the next range up for the rear.
Al
OK I get it. You are using the modified Franklin engine mount
that Chuck Harbert is using. Yes the back mount near the flywheel
does take almost all the load.
Paul Lamar
The Aircraft Rotary Engine Newsletter. Powered by Linux.
http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/ http://www.linux.org