Howard wrote:

Harry:
    My thought at first was the same as yours....... I wanted about the
power a one rotor would put out.... however the numbers stack up very
heavily against the one rotor.    You will eliminate only around 30 lbs

from

your engine over a two rotor...... strike one.....  You will need a

redrive

which adds probably at least that much weight..... strike two,   You

will

need probably the full flywheel weight plus some balance weights.....

strike

3..... You will need the same number of accessories at the same weights

as

the full engine... thus your power to weight ratio deterioriates.....

strike

5.

    If one looks at a two rotor 13B torque curve it is quite possible to
pull 50-70 hp at direct drive prop RPM... the low end torque curve is

very

flat.   My feeling is that a peripheral port housing with the ports

timed to

bring bottom end torque in rather than top end power would definitely
enhance direct drive possibilities.... unfortunately nobody I know of

does

this.
    Looking at direct drive.... eliminate 20 lbs flywheel weight.....
perhaps 25-30 lbs redrive weight..... My numbers say that a 2 rotor

direct

drive engine will be lighter, simpler and inherently more dependable

than a

single rotor engine with redrive...... so why bother????

                             H.W.

 "Castle, Ron" wrote:

Roger Hillyard did this on a dragonfly. Power output was between 60 and 70
hp. Prop only turned 2300 static.

The Aircraft Rotary Engine Newsletter.              Powered by Linux.

http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/            http://www.linux.org