Dale Smith wrote:

 You guys have just put your finger on the question that is my
primary problem with
 absorbing
 all the good information that is on this list!

 What is the "conventional wisdom"?  What conclusions can be
reached after the "give
 and
 take" discussions have run their course?  What solutions are 99%
certain? What
 assumptions
 remain to be tested?  ...  i.e. What works? (Snip)

Alfonso Lebron-Berges wrote:

Probably, at the end of any discussion cycle a polled consensus could
be established. Be it of approval, rejection or simply "without
enough data to support conclusions" it would be of the utmost
importance that each of the conclusions, although not in a permanent
way, be backed by real-life data.

In general the idea looks very atractive, due to its potential to
significantly reduce the search&try&research saga of anyone trying to
adapt and make more efficient the rotary aircraft application.

Alfonso Lebron-Berges

The AirCraft Rotary Engine NewsLetter.              Powered by Linux.

http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/            http://www.linux.org