they can make it a prerequisite to obtaining hangar or tiedown

space.

I've

never checked to verify this but if true it makes operating

without

insurance a non-option.

David Doshay wrote:

Proof of insurance ($1,000,000 liability, county listed as co-insured)

is

required for a tiedown or hangar where I live.

David

David, it's a lot easier to find liability coverage that does not

include

"in motion" coverage i.e. flight, taxiing, etc. Some insurance companies
and airports don't like construction of aircraft in hangars, but you
shouldn't have a problem getting coverage as long as it excludes in

motion.

If you need it and can't find it, give me a call.

ChucK Harbert

Robin wrote:

    Try checking with other airports.  I live around a fairly large city
with numerous airports and as it turns out most of them require no insurance
at all, and at others it's kind of a "Don't ask / don't tell situation:-)
(Actually, it was the smallest private airport that wanted the insurance.)
It's not that all of them wouldn't prefer insurance, but many clients who
have been around the patch forever never bothered with it, and to go back
now and begin to mandate insurance would cause an uproar and administrative
headache they would just as soon do without.

The AirCraft Rotary Engine NewsLetter.              Powered by Linux.

http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/            http://www.linux.org