Subject: Jack Cox
From: Paul
Date: 4/23/2001, 12:17 PM

"Ray Richardson Jr." wrote:

To Jack Cox, Tom Poberezny, and the EAA

We the team at Powersport Aviation have enjoyed
and will contune to look foward to reading all the
fine articles published by Jack Cox.

Jack Cox has strived to cover the home builder and
how best to get affordable kit plane products in the
hands of home builders for over 20 years.

Jack Cox has published more articles favorable to the
our rotary engine development than any other writter.
and probably has had more personal negative press from
the entrenched certified crowd for believing in our
rotary engines and covering our slow development
than other topics he could have written about.

All we, as rotary engine believers need to do is show the
aviation world a dependable proven product that will
proform as good or better than our competion.

Mazda's recent Detroit's showing of the planed rotary's
resurgeance and their  280 hp at 9,000 rpm in Europe
and a derated 250 hp in the US will help our cause.

While we are all working toward proving our point with
10 plus custormers with 500 plus problem free hours
with rotary engines, we should support the people and
our experamental movement that has allowed us the
right to build and fly our rotary engines in aircraft.

I offer a thank-you to
Jack Cox, Tom Poberezny, the EAA,
and Kitplanes magazine

Ray Richardson Jr.
Powersportaviation
www.powersportaviation.com

 
The AirCraft Rotary Engine NewsLetter.              Powered by Linux.

http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/            http://www.linux.org