What do you think Jon? Bid to hoist the stock or does it have technical merit?

A bit of both, I'd say. No reason the RPI engines can't run on hydrogen, and a hydrogen rotary engine might be a real product faster than hydrogen fuel cells. RPI certainly has viable technology and a strong technical heritage, but they seem to be very, very thinly staffed and very thinly capitalized at the moment (this from reading the SEC filings). I think that RPI would like to succeed as an engine developer/manufacturer, not just a stock pump & dump outfit. They are probably still many months or longer from generating any real revenues, so they need to keep investor interest high to generate $$ to operate. I'd guess they are trying to balance activities that further their long term strategic objectives (get a product into production) against activities that generate investor interest.

Just my guesses without knowing anything for certain.

Jon

 
The AirCraft Rotary Engine NewsLetter.              Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site.
http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/            http://www.linux.org