First on page 6 Mr. Hensley claims a Honda engine has a BSFC 29%
less than an aircraft engine so that would put it in the
the .28 BSFC category. Is he in for a rude surprise or what?

Classic "Lycosaur" wives' tale.  Obviously, this was the point of my starting the BSFC morass.  I hate seeing prejudice spouted as fact with unquestioned acceptance by a lot of people.  Engineering decisions (i.e., engine selections) need to be based upon empirical data, not unsupported opinion.  One piece of empirical data that should be obtainable by most are engine dynanometer curves.  Evaluating these would probably show that a Honda does not have much advantage (if any) over an aircraft engine when it comes to BSFC.

A subjective evaluation taking into account real world usage could be added to the empirica data.  This is where the advantages of the EFI and liquid cooling of the Honda come into play.  In typical weekend flyer mode, involving lots of throttle transients and low altitude operation, you could end up with a real world BSFC advantage for the Honda.  However, on a long cross country trip at altitude, the BSFC advantage would disappear.

Of course, this does not even begin to take into account all the other variables affecting engine selection, such as reliability (where the rotary shines), ease of installation, maintainability, etc.

I digress . . . I just hate it when people are so loose with numbers.  Damn salesmen.
Rick Price

 
The AirCraft Rotary Engine NewsLetter.              Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site.
http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/            http://www.linux.org