Jerry Hey wrote:

Putting that back panel in there reduced the velocity of
the air going through that portion of the radiator.

>From about 40 MPH out of the back side of the rad to

about 32 MPH out of the back side with an airspeed
of 74 MPH.

Here is a shot showing both the static pressure taps
and the velocity probes. Static pressure built up in the exit
chamber to impede the flow.

Anything within ten inches of the back side of the rad
is going to cut the flow. Keep the rad as far away

>from objects as you can. The closer the object such as

an oil pan, muffler or engine block the worse the flow interruption
and the bigger the rad required.

The easiest thing to do full scale  is
just measure the static pressures as once you have a good
inlet duct there is little you can do to enhance the flow
through a given radiator.

For the next test I will remove the back panel and change
the inlet area to see what effect that has on rad flow.

Paul Lamar

Assuming that there is some obtruction on the backside of the rad , (
given the lack of space inside most cowls this will probably be the
case)  then should the inlet be reduced accordingly to prevent a
build up of  blocking air in front of the rad?    I think it is
probably important the outflow   and inflow be proportional to each
other.    Jerry

No In effect what will happen is you will need a larger rad and
intake
for a given amount of cooling. Best to keep the rad as low as
possible.
See the previous message.

Paul Lamar
 
The AirCraft Rotary Engine NewsLetter.              Powered by
Linux.
ACRE NL web site. Copyright 1998-2002 All world wide rights
reserved.
http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/           
http://www.linux.org