Subject: Ross drive cudos & cons
From: ACRE NL
Date: 1/18/2003, 11:10 AM


It always amazes that this handful of gears that I can
hold
at arms length are strong enough to transmit 200 HP
continuously. They only weigh about six pounds.

Old Lou Ross was a genius for coming up
with this PSRU concept.

Thank you Ford and Lou Ross.  May Lou rest in peace.

Paul Lamar

-George Lendich wrote:

Paul,
You know their is some criticism of the Ross PSRU but when
it
all
boils
down
he did a marvelous job on getting it al together i.e.
thinness
of
housing
and shaft for weight savings and although the bearings are
somewhat
minimalist in design, but they seem to work OK except for
the
rear
sun
gear
thrust bearing which was non existent - over all a bloody
good
job.
Interestingly I was speaking to a Diesel mechanic who has
his
own
large
business and he was telling me the M-Benz trucks have a
similar
planetary in
the axels and guess what - they had serious thrust problems,
it
would
seems
they omitted a thrust bearing.
Having very limited room guess what they used, flat brass
bearing -it
seems
it does the job !
George (down under)-

I agree George. Except for a few minor details like the
missing
sun
gear
thrust bearings the original Ross was brilliant. Too bad they
are
not
still
in business. It was a simple matter for Ross to add the trust
bearings
on
the latter versions as in this picture. This consisted of
several
low
cost
needle bearings back to back reducing the RPM of each, greatly
and
disproportionally increasing their life. This alone was a
brilliant
idea.
A simple needle thrust bearing will take a tremendous amount
of
load
as long as the RPM is kept low.

Paul Lamar


-William Stevenson wrote:

Hi Paul   Do you know where I could get the thrust bearing
installed
for
a
Ross 2.17:1 redrive. Thanks Bill-

Anybody want to tackle this job for Bill? It will probably require
some
grinding
on the stock Ford sun gear to gain clearance necessary for the
thrust bearing.

I am tempted do it but I am over committed right at the moment.

Paul Lamar


Not to disparage Ross's work, it was a nice piece, but I consider
the
lubrication scheme to the weakest link in the design.  Fixing the
missing
thrust bearing was easy by comparison.

Tracy Crook
tcrook@rotaryaviation.com
www.rotaryaviation.com

Well perhaps but there are plenty of them out there on 13B gyro
coptors running flat out at 7500 RPM with no mods to the lube system.

Ian, did you mod the lube system on your Ross 2.85?
Paul Lamar


Yes, It appeared to me that the planet gears had inadequate lubrication
and
my thrust bearing even less. I added a feed to the  gears via an
existing
hole in the top of the stationary ring gear. 160hrs and still going
strong.
Ian.

Paul, most of my true rotor head friends have changed over to 2.85 drives,
and except for one guy, (Steve McGowan in Georgia) all of them (that I know)
have an added oil tap to the sun gear area... the same is true for the subie
guys as well... we all saw one trash the teeth and lock up once... it was a
Chrysler gear set, but didn't have the oil galleys.......... the post mortem
indicated a blueing from the heat!!

Gary Buster
Bridgeport, Texas
N263GB

Is that mod a recent development Gary? I did not notice that last year 
at Bensen Days. I had heard about the Chrysler gear set failure but I thought
it was the one way clutch.

Paul Lamar

The AirCraft Rotary Engine NewsLetter.  Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/            
Copyright 1998-2002 All world wide rights reserved.