Tom Smythe wrote:
Hi,
I'm the guy that was going to drop a 3 rotor into a Moose a while ago but, have been having second
thoughts as I just don't think the performance is what it could be (I also looked at the Aerocomp
birds but, again, think performance is lacking...).
So, I've undertaken designing a nice little six place plane of my own. Probably a composite bird
as I believe composites allow much more freedom and an aerodynamically clean airframe overall. To
that end, I still would like a powerplant in the 400HP range (like the Moose had with the latest
Russian radial but not the fuel hungry turbine on the Aerocomp models).
Given the ability of the rotary to handle quite a bit of boost, I've come up with the table below
(standard day):
2-Rotor 3-Rotor
13B 20B
NA HP @ 6,500 RPM 195 290
(guestimated)
Fuel Flow (lbs/min) 1.4625 2.175
Air Flow (ft^3/min) (59* 285.1875 424.125
day)
(air flow volume changes
with temp, but mass
stays the same and thus
the MAP)
400 HP Fuel Flow 3.0000 3.0000
(lbs/min)
400 HP Air Flow 585 585
(ft^3/min)
MAP @ Sea Level 2.05 1.38
MAP @ 10,000' 3.02 2.03
MAP @ 15,000' 3.64 2.45
MAP @ 20,000' 4.46 3.00
400 HP Air Flow 45 45
(lbs/min)
Recommended Turbocharger T61 T61
100% Power Ceiling 17,000' 26,000
The T61 is operating near the surge limit to achieve the HP required on the 13B. However, on the
20B, it's actually loafing along fairly nicely. Assuming the above numbers are correct, I'll be
planning the airframe around the 20B. Otherwise, it's back to the drawing board.
As an FYI, the airframe is a high wing design with fixed gear and a gross weight at 4,400 lbs
(give or take...) and usefull load of 1,800 lbs (600 lbs fuel). The initial design was created in
AirplanePDQ and is being evaluated in X-Plane (5.61).
Thanks,
tom
The AirCraft Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/
Copyright 1998-2002 All world wide rights reserved.