Thanks Paul. I asked Tracy about changing the gear
ratio a while
back,
and he said it would be a
completely different setup to do that. So I was
supprised to see
the
reference to 2.85:1.
According to his web site, his ration is 2.176:1. I'm
planning on
using
his unit, but would have
liked a little higher ratio. This new bell housing looks
very
interesting though. I expect to
need the reduction unit in the next 4 -6 weeks, so will
have to
consider
upgrading later.
Bob White
http://www.bobwhite-abq.com
I think the casting can be designed for both with minor
machining
changes.
Paul Lamar
Just to clarify, What I was saying is that the 2.176:1
drive cannot
be
retrofitted with the 2.85 : 1 gears *after* the casting is
machined.
I
plan to use the same casting for both 2.176 and 2.85 drives.
The
machining
will be different.
Tracy Crook
tcrook@rotaryaviation.com
www.rotaryaviation.com
I think Tracy is headed in the right direction.....He will
have a
"universal" product which will satisfy those wanting 2.17 OR
2.85 gear
ratios, and thanks to Paul Lamar's efforts, the casting concept
looks
great!
It looks a lot like a Ross redrive, which isn't a bad thing.
Watch the
orders pour in ! Paul Conner
Dan Ruggirello wrote:
Paul,
What is the status of the ultimate bell housing?
Dan
Its on hold. Tracy has some investment in NC machine tool programs
that
he is reluctant to have re written. Can't say I blame him too much.
He is
going to have to do it sooner or later as the RX8 engine redline is
9500 RPM
and people are going to start to wonder why they can only get 6500
RPM out of
their RX8 engine :)
Here is the 3D again for the new guys.
Paul Lamar
Could the redrive be made for one ratio and a spacer or ring used
to adapt to the other ratio, Virg
Virgil N. Salisbury AMSOIL
WWW.LUBEDEALER.COM/SALISBURY
I think that could be done using the cartridge approach.
Paul Lamar
The AirCraft Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/
Copyright 1998-2002 All world wide rights reserved.