There you go with typical engineering objectivity. I'd like to see how
well this plan would work. I like the adjustable angle on the rad.

I'm already far enough along where I'm going with the radiator inside

the

cowl, it's huge- 18" x 27". Also have an adjustable cowl flap. I'm

subscribing

to your overkill approach. The proof of the pudding won't be for another

year or two.

Brian Trubee

Brian,
There you go mate, your doing everything Paul's suggested and now he changed
his mind - completely !!
George (down under)

I am never satisfied with the status quo :) 

BTW What Brian is proposing is fundamentally
the same as the new idea except the rad can be even larger if necessary.
A rad that large will probably be under the engine and will probably dump
the air straight down out of the bottom of the cowl. That is the only way
it is going to work well.

I find it kind of strange people are jumping all over me for the new idea
when they accept this arrangement without question. IMHO kind of strange psychology.
A little like a shark feeding frenzy :)

Paul Lamar
 
The AirCraft Rotary Engine NewsLetter.  Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/            
Copyright 1998-2003 All world wide rights reserved.