> >>> > > boberrorusa wrote:

 >>>> > > Paul, please consider the attachment only if you feel it
might have any
 >>>> > > value. And is appropriate for "ACRE."
 >>>> > > Thanks, Bob.

 > >>>> http://www.ellison-tbi.com/homebuilt_court_decision.htm

 >>>Just shows to go you even if you have insurance on your experimental
 >>>does not mean the insurance company will not try to wiggle out of it
 >>>any way they can when you crash.
 >>>
 >>>Paul Lamar

 >Ken Welter wrote:

 >>  Bottom line is don't write it in the log book, if he had not written
 >>it in the book no one would have known.
 >>
 >>  Ken

 Also had he complied with the laws that regulate us he would not have
 had the problem either.
 We are supposed to self regulate ourselves in these matters. It is our
 duty and responsibility, to obey the law.
 Royce

He complied with the law as the FAA would not call this a major mod
and would not want to re certify something this trivial.
The law says that you can make mods and sign them off yourself in
this experimental world, can you imagine calling the FAA every time
we change oil coolers, radiators and other stuff that we do.
Also the FAA laws have changed since this old 1998 case and I have
heard that this case was part of what caused those changes.

  Ken

The AirCraft Rotary Engine NewsLetter.  Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/            
Copyright 1998-2003 All world wide rights reserved.