> > > Here are the specs on the prop:
> > >
> > > MTV-18 (.pdf, 59k)
> >
> > > 192 cm / 75.6 in 260 HP 2800
> > >
> > > I like your helicopter analogy! If I go the supercharger
route, maybe
> > > I'll have to install a tail rotor for the vertical stuff.
> > > I really appreciate this dialogue, Paul, thanks!
> > > Gordon, I can't find you in the Starduster Registry. Are you
listed?
> > > Ben
> >Wow that is a big prop to go 2800 RPM.
> >
> >Paul Lamar
Michael McGee wrote:
>
> Kinda like a Harley with after-market pipes setting off car
alarms for blocks.
> Cool.
> ..of course the NIMBY's would scream..
>
> Mike McGee, RV-4 N996RV, O320-E2G, Hillsboro, OR
> 13B in gestation mode
Ben Baltrusaitis wrote:
Those prop specs are from the MT web site and only match the
airplane/engine combination by horsepower. I contacted MT and they
will make a custom prop for my plane and the rotary engine so
diameter may be adjusted. However, I will be getting a composite
prop so rpm limits of 2800 are fine.
Ben
I think that will work fine. I ran the Sun 100 race at an engine rpm of
6250 which gave me a prop speed of 2872 rpm. Everyone who saw me cross the
finish line remarked how quiet it was so tip speed is apparently well below
critical. On a cool day (59 deg passes for cool in Florida) I turn 6400
rpm at top speed (2941 at the prop) and still don't get that loud cracking
sound that accompanies the tips going sonic so I still haven't hit the
limit.
Doing the math, at tip speed at 2941 is 870 fpm (on 68" prop). At SL, mach
1 is 1100 fps so looks like enough margin to me. Yes, I know you can't use
full mach 1 as the limit but even the rule of thumb 85% gives 935 fpm. Even
if you do push the limit during an aggresive aerobatic routine, who cares?
Go for it Ben.
Tracy
The AirCraft Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/
Copyright 1998-2003 All world wide rights reserved.