> George Lendich wrote:

 Paul,
 I've been trying to analyse our damper needs.

 I've looked at Tracy's wide mounted donut dampers utilising the
 torque converter mounting holes. It's a good idea using
 available mounting positions.

 I've looked at Ken's suggested damper, which seems to be two
 mounting plates with rubber in between, but nicely made. The damper
 material being more centrally located than Tracy's unit

 I've looked at Don Dunbars unit, a nice one piece unit more
centrally located than Tracy's unit.

 I've taken account of what you have said in the past about having
 the damper mountings closer to the centre rather than out wide
 and Tracy's testing of softer materials.

 I also concur with your flange mount input shaft idea.

 My only conclusion is that a one piece damper rubber about  5" diameter
 ( of a yet to be defined hardness) about 20mm thick,
 with mounting from the input shaft flange to the flex-plate, using
 the current flex-plate mounting bolt holes.

 IMHO this is the easiest, cheapest, lightest and best solution, give
 all the information available to me, so far.

 If you agree (and you may well not agree) - the finer points
 of mounting I leave open for discussion as this may require some
 special mounting bolts.

 I certainly will be using this idea on my own PSRU so any feed
back is most welcome.

 This may well solve Ken's immediate dilemma and test the concept for us.

 George

Do you have the engineering data on the similar damper that Don
Dunbar is using?

Paul Lamar

   Hey George will that tapper roller thrust bearing take the rpm ?
   I like the needle roller bearings better as you can stack them and
reduce there speed.

   Ken

 
The AirCraft Rotary Engine NewsLetter.  Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/            
Copyright 1998-2003 All world wide rights reserved.