<snip>

I tried it again with ( Netscrape) 4.6 and it still does not

work. I like 4.6 as it is fast.

Most things after that were bloat ware. It is buggy but >

nothing I can't work around.
<snip>

"Bryan Wilkinson jr." wrote:

Hi Paul
I always see if a site will display properly with Galeon , Or
KDE's Konquerer , even if that one tends to hog system
resources. My Mozilla installation packed up totally so I will
have to reinstall later.

Best of all IME is Dillo - this comes in a modifed version that
shows frames. Some sites whinge with this but it definitely
worth a try , Even though it dont have SSL support, unlike the
two above. Opera has & is well worth checking out.

Fly & Build Good - Bryan

We are taking our time in rebuilding our web site so that even the older
browsers that do not support frames can visit it. It is a frame based
site, but we are setting it up so that a noframe browser can read the
pages.
Frames make navigation so much easier,  but if a browser doesn't support
frames they would not be able to view it. By setting it up the way we
are, even a text based dos browser can view it. Don't want to leave
anyone out.
Royce

Hey I agree with compatability and old browsers but perhaps folks can now
leap
into the future...... Try Mozilla Firebird 0.7 it's even faster than IE6.0.
The Netscape 4.x
versions were so slow and buggy I gave up on them and ran IE5.x on my
Solaris and
HP boxes. Funny since the Mickeysoft empire is not exactly known for stable
software.

Anyway it's available for Winblows, Linux, Solaris, and Mac OS X.

http://www.mozilla.org/

If you need to email try Eudora or Mozilla Thunderbird. I haven't tested it
but there
is also Mozilla 1.6 for an all in one package.

http://www.eudora.com/

Karl

The AirCraft Rotary Engine NewsLetter.  Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/            
Copyright 1998-2003 All world wide rights reserved.