Alex Madsen wrote:

Have no fear. I am working on a P Ports CF Manifold as well as a
conventional manifold. It looks like the PP manifold will be much easier
to construct (cheaper). I have some questions about PP manifold layout.

1. Where is the throttle body placed? I in the R26B it looks like the
have it right next to the engine. Is it ok to put the TB on the end of
the runner?

2. Fuel injector placement. In the R26B they say they used an air funnel
injector and a PP injector (sae 920309 fig 14). However the air funnel
injector does not appear to be in any of the othere figures (fig. 4 & 5)

Was the air funnel injector eliminated? If not is it in front of the TB?

Regarding the length of my conventional CF manifold, I may have been a
little unclear about the length of the manifold. The "Port to Port"
length is 26 in. The Port to plenum length is 13 in. I just found out
today that the port to plenum length of the of the R26B runners at @
6500 rpm is about 13 in. This means that Eds length calculations are in
the right ball park. The question now is witch is greater the dynamic
intake effect or the resonate tube effect. I guess I will just have to
build on of each and put them on the dyno.

Alex Madsen

 
The AirCraft Rotary Engine NewsLetter.  Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/            
Copyright 1998-2003 All world wide rights reserved.