Perry Mick wrote:

Looking at these two photos, maybe it's an optical illusion, but

the new

prop drive with the large diameter shaft looks shorter. I can

understand

why he would do that - it's simpler. But wouldn't the long shaft
supported by a bearing as he originally had it be preferable and

allow

the prop to moved farther aft? With the support bearing, it

could be

designed to absorb thrust as well, although I think his wasn't.

Perry

Phil Flaugher wrote:

Distance from the end of the cowl/fairing to the edge of a prop/fan
blade appears to be about the same; the large tube length is
disguised with white paint.....?....

Phil

Joseph M Berki wrote:

Perry,
         Charlie made a lot of changes.  He shaved off a lot of weight and
the engine mount is composite I believe he moved the engine back.

Joe Berki
Limo EZ
Sealing sump tank

 
The Rotary Engine NewsLetter.  Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/            
Copyright 1998-2004 All world wide rights reserved.