> > > > > If so! my suggestion would be to step the Throttle Body OD to allow
> > for 2
> > > > > >O-rings and use two studs to hold the TB in and to keep pressure on
> > the
> > > > > >O-rings. Perhaps one could use the current stud and another at the
> > top.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>From pictures of Richard Sohn's project it would appear he is using
> > studs
> > > > > >to retain the TB.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >I think I will do it that way if I can.
> > > > > >George (down under)
> > >
> > > > George,
> > > > Using the stepped setup with o-rings is fine. The o-rings do get brittle
> > with age use the teflon encapsulated ones. I meant a press fit with no
> > o-rings but
> > > > water tight to be sure!
> > > > Bill Jepson
> Richard wrote:
> >
> > George,
> >
> > yes I am using studs, but the PP insert is all JB Weld fit. This is an easy
> > way to get the test engine going and not neccesarily the best solution for
> > the flight configuration. Also, if it turns out that my IO, which is the
> > same as the LeMans engine had, is too early I will loose the hard point for
> > the upper stud. Future testing will tell.
> > BTW, I just finished my test TB.
> >
> > Richard Sohn
> > N-2071U
> > unicorn@gdsys.net
> > www.gdsys.net/WWWmembers/unicorn/
> Hi Guys (and Girls), Take a look at the attached graph. Why wouldn't we want to identify our cruise RPM and then select the the port timing
that
> corresponds? This is for a 12A, but should be close. Also, why do we care about the PP being water tight - the rotor housing around the PP
insert
> is completely enclosed with epoxy or JBWeld.
>
> Ken Powell
The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/
Copyright 1998-2004 All world wide rights reserved.