Subject: RX8 fuel mileage
From: ACRE
Date: 9/15/2004, 6:57 PM


     So, it does depend on how you are driving, and driving in hills can
give
     > better gas milage than level ground under certain conditions.
But, I in
     > the more normal driving ranges, even with better bsfc goin
uphill,
     > better gas milage is obtained driving on the flat.
     >
     > That was fun,
     > Bob White
     >
     > --
     > http://www.bob-white.com
     > N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 (soon)
     >

     You did a great job Bob.

     Paul Lamar


Nice work Bob, If I might relate this to aircraft though, I do NOT
believe you can
make a similar arguement. The problem that would rear it's ugly head is
the prop
disk. On most powered aircraft the highest drag component is the
propeller in
decent.( A shallow decent not a intentional dive!) Unlike a car where
you can
literally "put it in neutral" most aircraft don't have a clutch or
transmission.
Indeed even if they did you would have to have a prop that would fully
feather
to take advantage of the "downhill" portion of the run while the engine
idled.
A practical example of this was printed in the Van's newsletter. There
was a
US Representitve or Senator, (possibly state) flying his own aircraft.
(I already like the guy) He had a failure of his prop extension or the
bolts. The
prop completely parted from the plane and fortunately didn't damage
anything else
while doing so. He (sorry I can't remember his name) declared an
emergency
and was closest to Truckee CA airport. Using his GPS's pre-programed
glide range indication he informed the Airport that he would probably be
about 2 miles short.
The glide range had been very accurate when practicing engineout
procedures
previously. The short story is that he made the airport EASILY.
Talking to Van later he was told, "Sure the plane makes a MUCH better
glider
without the propeller" I'm sure Vance can verify this as well. If you
have to
prove this to yourself go up in anything with a constant speed. Idle the
engine
and set best glide in corse pitch. Then set the prop to flat pitch and
you will
think you just threw out an anchor! (be careful not to stall)!
Bill Jepson


Here is another story about CAFE Foundations way to measure "zero-thrust".
Check their website, http://www.cafefoundation.org/index.htm
 and read the report on Dave Anders RV-4 for a good aerodynamics "lesson"!
http://www.cafefoundation.org/aprs/RV-4.pdf
 Somewhere in there they mention the installation of a sensor that measures
against the prop backplate. When the prop is pulling it will pull away, if
it is idling it will push on the sensor - basically they use the movement
between the pressure bearings in the engine. The idea is to establish a
powersetting that neither "pulls nor pushes".......
To verify, that this will work they did a tow on a C-152 without a prop!!
http://www.cafefoundation.org/aprs/propless.pdf

There is also other interesting stuff to study on their. Probably not
everything is applicable to Rotaries, but a good read anyway!
And plenty of neat aircraft tested!! Generally rathre fast things!

Thomas J.

 
The Rotary Engine NewsLetter.  Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/            
Copyright 1998-2004 All world wide rights reserved.