> >>>>>> Edward Klepeis wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Dear Paul
> >>>>>> If Tracy would want it. I would build a custom system for
> >>>> him instead of the system he has which doesn't work. I make the
> >>>> offer he
> >>>> has to say yes or no. I think Tracy's time is too
> >>>>> valuble
> >>>>>> to be going round and round with a system that doesn't work
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Regards Ed
> >>>>
> >>>>> Tracy Crook wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Gee guys, before defining my cooling system as one which 'doesn't
> >>>> work', please consider that it has been flying successfully for 11
> >>>> years
> >>>> and 1400+ hours. Also consider that my last Renesis
> >>>>> progress report was written after the first flight test (1 hour).
> >>>>> If
> >>>> you have ever developed an aircraft engine installation, you will
> >>>> appreciate that it takes a bit longer than that to optimize
> >>>>> things.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I haven't had a chance to update the website but I have a total of 5
> >>>> hours on the Renesis and have a long list of things to do. It took 2
> >>>> weeks to correct the first thing on the list (improve water
> >>>>> pump inlet plumbing). This has been completed and the plane is
> >>>>> ready
> >>>> to flight test as soon as these blasted hurricanes leave. I can't
> >>>> even
> >>>> begin to evaluate the new intake system until all the
> >>>>> other squawks are addressed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tracy
> >>
> >>> I know how you feel Tracy, this place is a butcher block! Take your
> >>> time,
> >>> you obviously have far more experience and flight hours than anyone.
> >>> You
> >>> just continue to do it your way!
> >>>
> >>> Ben Schneider
> >>>
> >>> Ben Schneider
> >>
> >> Yea Tracy... go on dribbling water all over the rads. Works like a
> >> charm :)
> >>
> >> Paul Lamar
> >>
> >> yes. By all means. Keep making it look like a collection of junk yard
> >> parts tracy. There are too many slick outfits around selling 250 HP
> >> subaru
> >> engine conversion like eginfeller and crossfire. dave atkins has a
> >> much
> >> more professional looking installation. you don't want to
> >> get confused with them. think how many gear boxes and computers you
> >> would
> >> then have to make. No time left for fooling around. J.C.
> I propose a new guideline. Only those who have achieved flying rotary
> installations shall be allowed the privilege of looking down from on
> high and critiquing others. All in favor?
>
> Chris Cosman
Neigh. If that was the case it would take a 100 years and untold number
of lives. During the last six and a half years we have lost two lives
in rotary powered airplane crashes by people that were not on here!
That is not good PR for rotary powered airplanes. We have a lot
of intelligent engineers (myself not included) on here who have not flown
their own airplane yet. I want to read their criticism.
Furthermore if somebody votes yes I will ignore the post.
Do I make myself completely clear?
Paul Lamar
Perfectly. I have no problem with accepting advice, criticism, ideas, etc from others (flying or not) but it should be based on objective data. So far, all I've heard on this subject
is just hearsay & innuendo.
Tracy Crook
The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/
Copyright 1998-2004 All world wide rights reserved.