I would not expect 321 to crack and fail in thermal cycles
> >> below 1600
> >> > degrees. I don't know how
> >> > hot the cool tube will become but if it does not reach 1600
> >> degrees then no problem, ever. Jerry
> >
> >
> >> Jerry, my two cents worth is this- why risk it? I thought I'd just use
> >> a heater core since we are using a liquid cooled engine, but then I
> >> saw that someone (don't remember who) just took air from the back side
> >> of the radiator. This way, you don't have the worries of an exhaust
> >> leak, and don't have the worries of the weight and potential failures
> >> of a heater core.
> >>
> >> Brian Trubee
Matt Prather wrote:
>
> I don't think you get enough temperature rise by just piping air off
> the back side of the radiator - especially in the winter when you need
> the heater the most and the input air is the coldest. You could put
> a winterization kit of sorts on it. Feed cabin air via scat tube up to
> a duct mounted on the corner of the radiator, and then heated air from
> the same corner of the radiator back to the cabin.
>
> It still seems slicker to mount a small heater core in the cabin. Maybe
> slightly heavier, though.
>
> Regards,
>
> Matt-
Those are good points. The reasons that I decided to try taking hot air off the back of the radiator are these-
Elimination of the weight of a heater core.
elimination of potential failures of two heater core hoses, and at least four fittings.
Also, I'm using a cowl flap, so I shoud be able to control the coolant temperature. with the cowl flap, I should be able to almost completely close off the exit air from the cooling system if I
wanted to. If this scheme doesn't provide me with enough heat, I've got a heater core sitting on the shelf, it would be no real problem to install it later.
Brian Trubee
Rv-4, hoping to be done by next summer.
The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/
Copyright 1998-2004 All world wide rights reserved.