Subject: rotary risk assessment
From: Rotary Engine
Date: 6/4/2005, 12:01 PM
To: AA-me


 From: al p wick <alwick@juno.com <mailto:alwick@juno.com>>
 > Date: 2005/06/01 Wed PM 05:53:06 EDT
 > To: Cozy_Builders@mailman.qth.net <mailto:Cozy_Builders@mailman.qth.net>
 > Subject: COZY: Rotary risks
 >
 > I'm part way thru measuring Rotary risks. Using Tracy's newsletters as
 > basis (what a neat guy). One thing is abundantly clear, it is a very high
 > risk install. Substantially higher than the Lycoming. I know this is
 > going to upset a lot of people. I don't want to remain silent when I have
 > facts that may save a life. ...

 >
 > Fire away!
 >
 > -al wick
 > Artificial intelligence in cockpit, Cozy IV powered by stock Subaru 2.5
 > N9032U 200+ hours on engine/airframe from Portland, Oregon
 > Prop construct, Subaru install, Risk assessment, Glass panel design info:
 > http://www.maddyhome.com/canardpages/pages/alwick/index.html



I find it annoying that your only 1/2 way through an 'assessment' and
you've already decided to draw a conclusion and then announce it with no
data other then.. " lookie what I did..". Personally your not saving my
life with this rather it's just shown that I should ignore the rest of
your posts as a "my engine is better then yours " posting.

Ian
BAS

Well put Ian.

Paul Lamar

The Rotary Engine NewsLetter.  Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://www.rotaryeng.net
Copyright 1998-2005 All world wide rights reserved.