Subject: M2 13B Install Pix]
From: Rotary Engine
Date: 9/29/2005, 8:57 AM
To: AA-me



                Jerry-


                The only thing keeping my engine where it belongs is a
            2x4.  This

                worries me, since I share the hangar & my airplane gets
            moved around

                when I'm not there.  So, to answer your question, getting
            the rear mount

                was my #1 project.  I do have the local guy who could
   fab it
            for me --

                he's ready to whip it out for me quickly once given the
   right

                measurements but he doesn't weld, so I'll have to find a
            welder too.


            Mark here is a photo of the prototype strut bracket.  Two
   things to
            note:  one, the inside measurement is 1" which is also the
   outside
            measurement of the rod end.  You may have to file the inside
            faces of
            the bracket to get a smooth fit.  Secondly, the bracket is
   off set
            toward the pilots side about an inch to clear the pan bolts so
            that  you
            can get a wrench on them.  check to make sure it will still
   line
            up with
            the firewall bracket.  If it will do the job, I will
   complete the
            welding and send it to you.  You will have to enlarge the
   bolt holes
            (Rod End) in the bracket.  Also, the bolt holes that attach to
            the pan
            will have to be enlarged (presently drilled for 1/4 inch.)   I
            am not
            set  up  yet to make the final version but it will be
   similar to
            what
            you see here. Lastly, there is a lip on the pan that will have
            to ground
            away in the area of the bracket.  I do have an extra Barry
            washer.   Jerry

            P.S.  It is heavily constructed.  If you want to drill a few
            lightening
            holes, go for it.


        Jerry -

        Thanks - I'll drive out to the hangar tonight after work & check
        clearances & whatnot and get back to you.

        Mark


   Well, the hard point itself doesn't allow for any offsetting at all.
   The bolt hole is dead-center & there is no structure anywhere else
   (e.g., toward port) to tie into.  The rod ends don't look like they
   would support any kind of angle to the strut.  Further, the prototype is
   set up for bearing from underneath.. Based on the photo, it looks like
   the mounting brackets don t extend out enough to allow a strut to come
   down from the top.

   So - it looks like this bracket won't do the job for my installation.
   Thanks, tho.

   Mark

   What is the matter with coming up from the bottom Mark
   as in this 3D?

   Coming down from the top is not out of the question.
   That big 1/2 inch shank on the rod end can take some bending loads.
   There are ways around it. Do me a favor and use a fish
   scale hooked to the back of the engine to measure the force
   required to level the engine when you have a prop on there.
   Or if you don't have a prop yet you can hang the weight of
   a prop off the prop flange. This  will tell me precisely
   where the CG of your engine is so I can  calculate the exact
   loads on the rear motor mount.

   Also are you thinking of replacing the oil pan? If so
   a bracket suitable for coming down from the top can
   be incorporated in the back panel of the oil pan.



Paul-

The design of the M2 has the fuselage forward top skin taking torsional
loading from the engine.  The 5th hard point is part of this & the
designer prefers that it be used when mounting a high power engine.
He's ok not using it up to about 220HP at the prop.  So I was pretty
happy to dedicate it to the rear engine mount.  And, of course, Jerry
has already built a perfectly lovely engine mount, so the idea of
mucking about with it to add additional tubes for the rear mount don't
satisfy.  Finally, I was liking the strut with rod ends design because
it would make it trivial to adjust thrust angle should it be necessary.

You are right that much of the weight is already carried by the SBeam.
We picked the engine up by hand & were suprised how far forward the
redrive brought the CG, even without a prop.  I don't think a prop will
result in a CG at the SBeam, but it won't be all that far off..  I will
get a scale & measure the weight at the rear.  I'll add weight to the
prop flange if anyone can tell me what a 3-bladed prop weighs.

I was not planning to replace the pan.  I agree it's shape is a
nuisance, and that it will be difficult to drain oil from once the
radiator is mounted.  But I wasn't seeing a compelling need to replace it.

Mark

I just sent and oil pan alternative. Move the ears over to the center
of the pan and space them far enough apart to clear the center pan bolt.
The 1/2 bolt going through the pan ears and the rod end will
take considerable bending load no problem. You will
then need short spacers between the rod end and the pan ears on
each side. The same trick will work on a Jerry Hey style
steel bracket.

Paul Lamar

The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://www.rotaryeng.net
Copyright 1998-2005 All world wide rights reserved.