That is not the reason. The displacement is what it is.
 From near the end of the last discussion on this subject and from
now on I will let R.F.Ansdale do all the talking for me on this
subject.  You will have to tear him apart piece by piece to prove
it to me. Furthermore Ansdale's excellent detailed and rigorous
analysis
was sufficient to silence all of your former disciples :)

If I am reading page 56 of Ansdale correctly, then the Mazda "13B"
Wankel engine would be considered by Ansdale as equivalent to a
four-stroke four cylinder piston engine of displacement equal to 2.6L (2
x 2 x 650cc).

Did I get that right?  Do you (Paul) concur?

Russell Kent

Absolutely positively no doubt about it.

Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.

The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://www.rotaryeng.net
Copyright 1998-2005 All world wide rights reserved.