Subject: New R3350TC data
From: Rotary Engine
Date: 3/3/2006, 9:04 PM
To: ACRE NL


    snips....

    "So theoretically it should be a wash between the engine driven
    compressor and the turbocharger since it takes the same amount of energy
    to drive the compressor."

    As far as net HP output is concerned this is probably true.
    Given that this is true, and all the mechanical power to drive the
    compressor comes from the core engine, each additional core engine
    mechanical HP generated requires 4 HP worth of fuel burned as the core
    engine is only 25% or so efficient. On the other hand if all the
    power to drive
    the compressor is extracted from the waste heat in the exhaust the
    overall efficiency will be higher. I think they used the stock
    2 speed mechanical driven compressor because it was there in the
    original B29 version of the R3350.


    Gordon I forgot to explain one thing here. Since the compressor and
    the turbine
    are on the same shaft, and are geared to the e-shaft on the test
    configuration
    using the stock turbo charger, in effect it is both a supercharger and a
    turbo charger. If the torque from the engine is greater than the torque
    from the turbine the compressor will be partly powered by the
    engine. This configuration may accelerate the engine RPM faster than the
    plain turbo charger. That does not concern us in the aircraft
    configuration.

    (BTW Due to increased rotational inertia it won't accelerate as fast
    as if the engine was powering just the compressor as in a pure
    supercharger. On the other hand the engine is sucking out its own
    exhaust gas.)

    As engine RPM builds up and hopefully excess turbine power rises
    more of the torque required by the compressor will come from the turbine
    and less from the e-shaft. If there is any turbine torque left over
    it will
    be applied to to the e-shaft.

    Adjustments to this system can be made in several ways.

    1)The turbine can be made larger or smaller (A/R changed).

    2)The compressor can be made larger or smaller.

    3) The gear ratio between turbo charger and e-shaft can be changed.

    4) An over running clutch can be added so the engine never drives
    the turbocharger.

    I suspect that a fixed gear ratio can be found that will work as
    is because I suspect the turbine is more powerful than necessary
    to merely compress the combustion air at a steady engine RPM.

    If this can be made to work the advantage is less heat lost to the
    second turbine and its additional hot plumbing required. Not to the
    mention the simplicity and lighter weight.

    Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.

    Paul,

    What you're describing is a single turbine with both the compressor and
    the gearbox on the same shaft? Essentially a turbocharger with a gearbox
    added and a belt to the engine?

    This sounds good, if it can be made to work. In fact this is better than
    having the supercharger on its own dedicated belt drive. But how are you
    going to add the gearbox to a turbocharger shaft, sandwiched in the
    middle?

    I certainly think this is better than having two turbines, which I
    honestly believe will dump off more exhaust energy than it is worth.
    Regards,

    Gordon.

    Yes exactly.
    I just finished the 3D. I wanted to make sure everything fits.

    I already had to make a change in the diameter of the drive pulley
    to get the multi V belt drive to clear the water pump pulley and
    still have a 2:1 speed reduction. The drive pulley is now 2.5 inches
    and the e-shaft pulley is now 5 inches pitch diameter.

    Here is the 3D.

    Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.

Thanks for the drawing, Paul.

Very interesting.

I'm not sure I'm reading the parts correctly. It looks like the pulley
is in front in the green, behind which is the traction drive in black
followed by the compressor? Or is that the turbine wheel?

Regards,


Gordon.

Yes that is it. The turbine is brown. The dimensions are very close
to the stock turbo charger on the 89 to 91 Turbo II engine.
It needs a little more cosmetic work :)

The traction drive is four inches in diameter and about 2.5 inches
long not counting the output shaft snout. Here is a 3D of
the traction drive.


Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.

The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://www.rotaryeng.net
Copyright 1998-2006 All world wide rights reserved.