Subject: Simple Cycle engine
From: Rotary Engine
Date: 3/20/2006, 9:46 PM
To: AAme




Paul,
Steve is a good friend and retired from Honda.  I know you've said that
you don't want to involve yourself with anything that doesn't have a
rotor, but I thought you would at least want to know about this engine.
jd

Begin forwarded message:

> *From: *"Steve Loizeaux"
>
>     John,
>
>     I've pitched the engine from LIM Technology in previous emails,
>     but now that it's had common-rail fuel injection installed and
>     been tested (the too-long report is attached), the inventor, Jeff
>     Klein, is even more intent on finding a development partner. Do
>     /you/ know anyone in (or outside!) the industry who' might be
>     willing to evaluate the Simple Cycle engine, and consider
>     investing/participating in its further development?
>
>     I've been to LIM Technology twice and seen prototype engines run.
>     This is not something an eccentric inventor did in his mother's
>     garage. And, frankly, it's way ahead of Bruce Crower's six-stroke
>     water injection setup described in my recent email! The Simple
>     Cycle engine has no conventional valve train, runs cooler than
>     engines that route exhaust thru the head, and would weigh
>     less, have greater power density, get better fuel mileage, and
>     cost less to build than a conventional engine of similar
>     size/output. One application for it would be a diesel-electric
>     hybrid, best choice for the near future according to MIT.
>
>     LIM has a rep in Europe who's pitched the LIM valve and the Simple
>     Cycle engine to major EU auto and parts makers. Some (like
>     Peugeot) have responded, asking about the valve technology. The
>     only concrete response so far is a "letter of interest" from
>     Dassault (I thought they only built jet fighters!)
>
>     This IS a serious project. From a conceptual perspective
>     alone---combining the new valve design with a unique rearrangement
>     of conventional diesel engine components---the engine's
>     considerable potential should be obvious to any mechanical engineer.
>      LIM Technology L.L.C.
>
>     150 Blades Lane, Suite E
>     Glen Burnie, MD 21060
>     ceo@Limtechnology.com <mailto:ceo@Limtechnology.com>
>     (410) 760-8801
>
>
>
>     February 26, 2006
>
>
>     When a Maryland start-up company announces a major improvement in
>     the field of internal combustion, it sounds like the wrong topic
>     in the wrong place. Today, politicians advocate hybrid cars, fuel
>     cells, and fuel from corn, and the president touts hydrogen as
>     the fuel of the future. But wouldn't a new engine technology which
>     is very fuel-efficient and inexpensive to build be worth a closer
>     look? LIM Technology holds exclusive rights to patents on such
>     technology, four in the U.S., three of them internationally.
>
>     The LIM technology team includes four mechanical engineers, two
>     with PhD degrees: Mark McVea, a consultant based in Camillus, NY
>     who teaches SAE seminars on engine and transmission technology,
>     and Douglas M. Baker of TECAT Engineering, based just outside
>     Detroit. Our chief engineer, Konstantin Mikhailov, has a masters
>     degree, and works in the Maryland headquarters.
>
>
>
>     We've built three working prototype diesel engines in our Maryland
>     machine shop. The latest was shipped to Detroit where it underwent
>     operational testing and analysis, and computerized modeling
>     of theoretical performance. The results showed a very competitive
>     ratio of power output to fuel consumption over its entire
>     operating range, easy starting in cold weather, low idle speed,
>     and a high, flat torque curve.
>
>     The LIM Simple Cycle engine is designed to take better advantage
>     of the laws of physics than conventional engines. It relies on the
>     same principles developed and widely adopted after the first
>     four-stroke engine was patented (in 1875), but our unique
>     application of those principles makes it “simpler, smaller, smarter”
.
>
>     If you're qualified to invest in a start-up venture, you may want
>     to read the /first draft/ of Dr. Baker’s report [attached]. While
>     not a business plan or prospectus, it /is/ a scientific assessment
>     of the Simple Cycle engine's potential based on operational tests,
>     and analysis of the resulting data.
>
>     Our prototype 2.8 liter (159 cu. Inch) three-cylinder engine was
>     able to idle at 180 rpm. Dr. Baker’s studies indicate it
>     would idle for over seven hours on less than a gallon of fuel. A
>     conventional engine would idle at around 800 rpm---and probably
>     die at less than 600---so if you let it idle seven hours, it
>     would likely consume over /two/ gallons of fuel. Based on test
>     data from our prototype, power density, and fuel economy---even at
>     full power, are projected to be better than a
>     conventional engine. One of Dr. Baker's areas of expertise is the
>     design and application of modern diesel fuel injection. We believe
>     this combination of best intake-air and exhaust management (*LIM*)
>     and best fuel management (*TECAT*) will result in an
>     industry-leading product, likely to produce industry-leading
>     profitability.
>
>     Profitability doesn't require a large market share because in the
>     global market more than 100 million multi-cylinder engines are
>     produced every year. The Wankel rotary engine, for example,
>     another pioneer technology, but not nearly as fuel-efficient as
>     ours, is today found mainly in Mazda sports cars which
>     command far less than 1% of the world market. However, adjusted
>     for inflation, the Mazda engine development group earned more than
>     a billion dollars.
>
>     Today, the market is much larger, our Simple Cycle technology is
>     far more fuel-efficient, and our engine is highly likely to do
>     better. The purpose of this letter is to motivate you and others
>     to join this dedicated group; to help bring to market new
>     technology which will extend the useful life of our petroleum
>     reserves and reduce the costs of commercial and personal
>     transportation.
>
>
>
>     Based on the discounted value of anticipated future net income, we
>     think a current high-risk valuation of LIM should be $30
>     million. We think no more than $3 million in new investment will
>     be needed to get us to commercialization.
>
>     Two of our three prototypes are still in Glen Burnie, and can be
>     demonstrated on short notice. The most advanced prototype, with
>     common-rail fuel injection, is in Livonia, Michigan, at McLaren
>     Engines, where a great many engines and transmissions are tested
>     and analyzed. To see a demo of this latest engine, contact Dr.
Baker.
>
>
>     *Contacts:*
>
>     LIM:  Jeffrey Klein,  (410) 760-8801,  Glen Burnie,
>     MD    www.limtechnology.com <http://www.limtechnology.com>
>
>
>
>
>     TECAT:  Douglas M. Baker,   (248) 615-9862   Livonia, MI
>     www.tecatengineering.com <http://www.tecatengineering.com>
>
>
>
>     Douglas Baker, PhD, operates TECAT Engineering, his own consulting
>     business. He has proposed forming a company owned jointly by LIM
>     Technology and TECAT to cross-license the existing technologies of
>     both companies, and add to the new company any technology
>     that either company develops in the future. This would ultimately
>     diversify our proposed product line. Dr. Baker’s skills in digital
>     simulation and fuel injection design are essential to LIM's
>     success. And LIM's  patented valves are important to Dr. Baker's
>     success: he plans to include them in an engine design he's been
>     working on for years. We're obligated by agreement not to disclose
>     any details, but his "NexTier" technology and "Revolation" engine
>     will have great high-end value for military users and others who
>     need exceptional power from a small package, good fuel
>     consumption, and low emissions.

------------------------------------------------------------

Its a diesel engine. Too heavy for aircraft use and they tend to destroy
propellers because of a sharp power pulse. The .37 BSFC is nice but a good
power to weight ratio is not among their strong points.  Been there and
done that since 1932 :) Never really caught on. Also the .37 BSFC tends
to be at about 50% power. At higher power levels the BSFC of a diesel
approaches that of a gasoline engine. From the looks of it
it is not exactly compact either.

BTW I just bought a Honda Odyssey. Great minivan.

--
Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.

Paul and others - this looks like simply the old GMC two stroke Diesel with
the exhaust and scavanging
ends swapped nothing to support claims of great perf increase - low cost -
simplification nor
light weight.
Incidently I hear that an Audi Diesel ALMP2 won the 12 hour race overall
Vance



The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://www.rotaryeng.net
Copyright 1998-2006 All world wide rights reserved.