Paul,
Attached are pics depicting the clearance between the motor mount tube
and the aft face of the oil cooler.  If I were to enclose the this area
would there be enough space there for good cooling.  This scenario would
feed a square ejector placed beneath the engine.  I was also thinking of
a chimmny in front of the engine with the ejector running on top of the
engine.  Heat rises why cook the gear box.  I will keep thinking.  (
dimensions 3" at the front 5" at the rear 4" as shown.)

Joe Berki
Limo EZ

I am not sure what you have in mind Joe. How about a sketch.
If this is the back side of the cores you don't need to enclose
them. Just seal the feed ducts and the cowl and let the ejector
suck the hot air out.

Here also are some old shots of your layout. Does your MM still
look like jpg 371?

-- 
Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.

Yes, it still looks like that.  I assume that if I use the whole cowl as a
pressure vessel that the augmenter will be the only way out.  One of the
options I was looking at was to modify the scoop and put the rads on the
floor of the scoop and exhaust it out the bottom like Perry did (no
augmenter). I see this on a lot of the drawings that you did for tractor
installations.  My concern is all of the the hot turbulent air being fed
into the prop. With an augmenter ejector it would be expelled close to the
hub.  I was also thinking about an augmenter on to of the engine as heat
rises it would not subject the whole cowl to heat.  That is why I asked
about the remote water pump.  Thanks for any help.

Joe Berki
Limo EZ

I see getting the exhaust pipes up and over the intake
manifold as a problem. How much room do you have in front of
the engine?

Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.

The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://www.rotaryeng.net
Copyright 1998-2006 All world wide rights reserved.