Subject: VAM muffler reweld
From: Rotary Engine
Date: 9/6/2006, 4:01 PM
To: AA-me

             Paul-

             You indicated in a prior email that I was going to need to get
        my VAM
             muffler re welded at the flange connection due to the
   existing weld
             being
             on the wrong side (the outside vs. the inside).

             Does this mean I need to get the outside welds removed, or
        simply add
             inside welds?  If I'm removing the outside welds, then I
   likely
        have a
             problem, since cutting them out will remove much needed length
        on the
             exhaust tubes -- I dont have extra clearance on my mount
   tubes
        to allow
             them to be shortened.  What about simply adding support
        brackets from
             the slide throttle down to the VAM to dampen vibration loads?

             mrs

             Looks like you will have to replace the tubes as the heat
   affected
             zone would still be there. Also brace it back  up to the
   engine to
             take the cantilevered loads off the tubes.

             While you are at it use two smaller tubes instead of
             one large one to quiet it down.

             --
             Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.



        I'll need a 3D of what you're proposing with respect to  2 smaller
        tubes.

        What's the reason for the redesign?   If it is cantilever loads
   causing
        cracking, why not simply provide strapping to brace it & be done
        with it?

        mrs

        Its some of both. The cracking is occurring just out side
        the weld so what is happening is the molecular structure of
        the metal is probably being modified in that area. Perhaps it is
        becoming more brittle. The strap is insurance. Bad things
        happen when these pipes crack due to the intake system
        being so close. You have five years invested and $30,000
        so better safe than sorry. We now have at least two failures
        of the same kind.

        OK on the 3D's I'll do it tonight.

        --
        Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.

   Barring other concerns/limitations, things should be designed with
   structural efficiency in mind.  Doing so allows the use of  the lightest
   material and yields the best strength to weight.  Cantilevering anything
   is generally not good for structural efficiency..  Bracing _is_ good
   however.

   In the case of the exhaust system, the operating temperature is high
   enough that the material is weakened, and it's attached to a vibrating
   machine.  The physical characteristics of the system material has been
   changed locally by welding - more brittle than the base metal.  Triple
   challenge.  Plus, as Paul said, the consequences of a failure of the
   exhaust system can be catastrophic - dangerous.

   Supporting the muffler via straps/struts takes advantage of geometric
   structural efficiency and can, by an order of magnitude, make the system
   more rugged and trouble free...  Even the conventional naturally
   aspirated aircraft engines often (usually?) have struts/braces
   supporting the mufflers.

   I am still convinced that slip/ball joints and or flex sections are
   needed on a 2 into 1 (muffler) system.  If your system has two separate
   stacks which aren't rigidly tied to each other (or something else), you
   might get away with out it (for a while).

   The locations of the flexible sections should be considered carefully to
   allow for the pieces of the system to change dimensions.  Ideally, it
   seems that one of the pipes that leads from the engine to the muffler
   should have a flex coupling in two places plus a slip fitting, while you
   could probably get a way with the other pipe not having any..  Doing
   this would allow the muffler and the engine to change sizes pretty
   dramatically but not put any stress on any of the welds.


   Regards,

   Matt-

   Matt please take a look at this. I just updated it.
   http://www.rotaryeng.net/exhaust.html

   Paul Lamar

The Hatch style system looks good to me..

http://www.rotaryeng.net/everexh.jpg

This one looks like it would run for a while, but eventually fail -
short, rigid stacks I assume, but can't see from this picture.

http://www.rotaryeng.net/Ed-Klepeis-p8050012.jpg


Regards,

Matt-


Thanks Matt.

Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.

The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://www.rotaryeng.net
Copyright 1998-2006 All world wide rights reserved.