The smart money will go and immediately get an Intel based Mac.
Paul you are too smart and too creative to not be on the best and
nicest equipment.
On the new Macs you can run Windows, when you have to....
Linux when you don't care to be bothered by MS ....
and Mac OS all the rest of the time.
When we were 15 computers, 20 years ago, we stopped using Windows.
Today we are 100+ and counting, 98% are Macs, ( the rest are some
pretty dog-tired Sun Workstations) and essentially all we do is
engineering work.
Reeves
Naw I'll stick with Intel Linux Gnome and Redhat and one or
two Windows computers for stuff I can't get on Linux.
I have everything set up for that scenario.
Paul Lamar
Reeves, I'm a forum lurker who's interested in rotary engine
installations in homebuilt aircraft. I'm interested in whether or not
you or your colleagues have any experience running SolidWorks Office on
the new Intel-based Macs. I was a MacIntosh afficionado for years until
I began using SolidWorks several years ago. I would love to get back to
using a Mac if I could run SW (2006) just as fast as I presently can on
my Win XP Pro. If a new Mac would work for me, this Pentium IV would go
to my daughter (or into the trash). She'd be delighted to get it because
she has had very little exposure to Macs.
Larry Loo
Larry,
It works so well, its scary. Recent post from a SW user on Macintouch.com :
"Just so everyone is jealous of me, I have the 64-bit version of
Solidworks running on my Mac Pro and it's a screamer. I have no idea if
my hard-drives are running slow like so many posts have stated i.e.:
http://macprojournal.com/xp.html , but I suspect they are (defragment
took FOREVER!). Be that as it may, even with all the hardware issues I
still have Solidworks is AWESOME on the Mac Pro, even better than any
other Intel box I've used."
However, do your daughter a favor- throw the old box in the trash.
-Reeves
The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site.
http://www.rotaryeng.net
Copyright 1998-2006 All world wide rights reserved.