>> Perry just as a matter of interest please try a forward slip at high
>>> altitude and
>>> tell us what happens. For example is the canard stable or
>>> does it buck in yaw or pitch? I am curious. The C 172 with full
>>> flaps pitch bucks a little bit in a forward slip.
>>>
>>> Paul Lamar
>>
>>
>> All Cessna's that I've flown do this.. I think you'll find that
most
>> [if
>> not all] Cessna singles [ other than the 208 which I've not flown]
>> are not
>> approved for slip's w/ full flaps. I used to get into a divergently
>> unstable pitch situation all the time w/ a 182 when flying
>> skydivers.. it
>> was controllable when you were expecting it.. when you weren't [
the
>> first
>> few times it happened] it got your heart pumping.. Mind you.. these
>> where
>> Max rudder on a straight tail 182, w/ enough bank to keep the
heading
>> straight and then forward pitch until you reached Vfe and hold it
>> there..
>> w/ about 17inch MAP. Used to go from 2000 asl to 12000 and back to
>> 2000[surface] in 18 minutes.. The other way to do it was Vne and no
>> flaps
>> and 17"MAP.. but in the summer bump's you'd lose sight of the wing
>> tip's
>> during the bumps.. not a really secure feeling.. We got paid by the
>> trip so
>> the faster the better.. :-) 27 trips in 1 day was enough to wear
ya out
>>
>> Jarrett
>>
>>
>> Why do you think they are not approved for slips Jarrett?
>> Was it the pitch buck or was it some other reason?
>>
>> I have always known that but it does not bother me to do them
>> anyway in my angled tail 182. As far as I can tell it does not
>> pitch buck like a 172. Maybe I am doing them wrong :)
>>
>> Of course you can run out of gas as all the gas tends to
>> flow to the lower wing when the tank selector is on both.
>> But then again you are landing usually so you should not care
>> if the engine quits. Never the less I set the selector to the
>> upper wing. There is a scenario where someone may pull out on
>> the runway at the last minute.
>>
>> Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.
>
>
> I really couldn't say Paul, it could be for either of those
reasons, I
> would tend to think that most people wouldn't do a slip for
minutes on
> end
> so the fuel starvation is then less of a concern, the instability in
> pitch
> is a bit more of an attention getter. Cessna's are ok for
slipping w/ the
> flap's up so... most likely its the pitch issue w/ using
flaps. [ I'm
> guessin']
>
> Jarrett
>
>
>
> I have always been curious about this and I never found anybody
> that knew the reason. A lot of new instructors get freaked
> out when they do my bi annuals and I slip it in :)
>
> Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.
I think the Cessna prohibition against slips with flaps is related to
the Fowler flap mechanism not being designed for the lateral aerodynamic
load created by a slip. I was unaware of the pitch instability issue.
I suppose I've not slipped my '69 C150 J through enough altitude to
experience the instability.
Aubrey
I used to slip my C150M with partial flaps all the time. We have a
couple of fields out here with power lines & I made a habit of dragging
in high & then slipping down to short final. Couldn't use full flaps up
here in our DAs, so I can't comment on behavior at 40-degrees, but at
30-degrees it was tame as you could ever ask for -- as Jerry mentioned
in his response. Pitch was rock-stable for me.
Mark Supinski
I am going to get your engine out this week Mark come hell
or high water. Last week was too hectic.
--
Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.
The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site.
http://www.rotaryeng.net
Copyright 1998-2006 All world wide rights reserved.