> What do you guys have against this idea? What is wrong
> with it?
> > Paul Lamar

Not a thing.  I see no reason it won't work.  And work well...

Steve Webre
Broussard  LA
N3812V

Be better if the operation were reversed to the more common push in for
full flow with reversing lever system. Maybe fixed needle and moving orifice
with flexible fuel lines.... Not good. Turning the whole valve 180 deg
corrects the action but precludes the attachment of the cable directly and
in line with the needle end.

Colin Smith

Good idea.
The flex fuel line with the unit turned 180 degrees
and needle fixed idea will work well with the right hose
and fittings. McMaster has some some Teflon lined hose with SS
braids and do it yourself 304 SS fittings.
The smallest 3/16 ID (.1875" ID) hose would be fine.

Just locate the needle valves about ten or twelve inches away
on the top of the engine. The swivel female fitting on the end
that connects vertically with the slide throttle unit would help.

Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.

The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://www.rotaryeng.net
Copyright 1998-2006 All world wide rights reserved.