I already thought about the oil issue, but figure that the stock-
in-car
engine won't have a problem. We'll drain it before pulling the
thing
out of the car so it will have fresh oil for the demo.
However, even if the thing only runs an hour without water
(which has
been done in at least one car that I know of), that's about 59
minutes
longer than any other water-cooled engine will do.
Essentially, I'm not promoting the idea of an engine which
doesn't need
water so much as an engine which won't seize and kill you if you
lose
the water inflight. While I expect that it will stay running,
this IS a
test-to-failure demo. That's one reason for the big clock -- if
the
engine fails, we stop the clock then challenge any other engine
to match
the runtime.
Of course, we'll run a fan through the oil cooler and over the
engine,
to simulate inflight airflow, and that should help a little.
Keith
Keith,
Just playing devils advocate here....
How is running a water cooled rotary without coolant until failure
going to show the masses that it is superior to an air cooled
reciprosaur?
The air cooled recprosaur does not have coolant to loose....
One thing both engines have in common is a pressurized oil system,
however, if either engine looses oil pressure, they will both seize.
I guess I am just not sure what the demo will accomplish.
Heath Holbrook
A lot of people are installing auto conversions. Except for the
VW and
Corvair, all of these are water-cooled, and loss of coolant has
caused a
number of downed planes.
The main thing, though, is to grab attention. Nobody's ever heard
of a
water-cooled engine running without coolant -- "it can't be
done!" They
will come out of curiosity, even if it's morbid curiosity, and get
close
enough to see the pile of broken reciprosaur parts and other
displays.
We won't be just one more engine idea buried in the show somewhere.
Keith
I don't think this is going to work Keith. You will destroy
an engine to impress two dozen people. There used to be a display
in the flea market area of a piston engine running with out
oil as I recall.
Pilots are not all that concerned with the liquid
cooling per se. They want a simple reliable engine. That means one
cooling radiator and one oil cooler with simple, straight
forward, short plumbing. A carb or simple mechanical fuel
injection. Preferable a couple of mags. Something they understand
and are familiar with. They are also impressed by HP and
performance. Rate of climb and top speed. The ability to
burn cheap auto gas is a big plus for the rotary.
Lots of new aircraft piston engines if not most
require expensive 100LL.
> Paul Lamar
It will impress more than two dozen people. That no-oil engine was a
demo for a cylinder treatment. It ran a few minutes at a time. You
remember it now, even though you're not in the market for a piston
engine, because it's something that everyone "knows" an engine
can't do.
Everyone "knows" that the Wankel was a technological dead end,
expensive, unreliable and fragile. So we show them a cheap engine
yanked out of a wrecking yard, with NO modifications, doing something
that everyone "knows" an engine can't do, and they'll remember it, and
TALK about it.
What we're talking about is getting people to believe in a whole
different TECHNOLOGY. You should see some of the comments that I got
when I announced in a WAR Replicas forum that I plan to put a
rotary on
my 1/2 scale F4U.
There is no market for the 12A engines. Heck, I have a whole RX-7
with
the 12A that I can't get $100 for, and that's what I paid for the
thing!
So that's the engine series to use, while pointing out that it's two
generations back (which is why we can afford to history the thing).
One thing that I always tell skeptics when I do a presentation, speech
or demo is to prove me wrong! If they do their research, they will
find
out that I was right in the first place, and they will change sides.
The whole thing with the engine is just to get their attention anyhow.
Can you name 10 of the things exhibitors showed you last Oshkosh?
Probably not. Show them something amazing and they'll remember it.
When they drive home, they'll be thinking about how the engine in
their
car won't run a minute after losing all of its water, but ". . .that
old, ratty Wankel they pulled out of a wrecking yard kept running!"
They'll talk about it. The next time the subject comes up, they're
remember and maybe we'll have another rotary flyer.
But once they're looking at the "impossible," they will be more
accepting when they see the other things we want to show them.
Keith
Keith, I think this is a bad idea period. I cannot support it. Our
issue is to build an airworthy engine installation that is clearly
superior to all others. Destroying a junk engine is meaningless. Jerry
The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site.
http://www.rotaryeng.net
Copyright 1998-2006 All world wide rights reserved.