> Just to let everyone know I had a serious problem
> with a landing
> today and the plane is seriously damaged. Pilot has
> a scratch on his
> thumb.
>
> I had a pretty bad bounce on landing and after the
> second bounce,
> decided to go around. That was a mistake. I never
> got out from behind
> the power curve and ended up doing a high power skid
> into the grass on
> the south side of the runway. Both main wheels were
> torn off, the prop
> disintegrated, an the fuselage is somewhat bent.
> After contacting the
> ground, the plane did about 1/2 turn and skidded to
> a stop.
>
> Bob W.
>
> --
> N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 -
>
http://www.bob-white.com
> First Flight: 11/23/2006 7:50AM - 3.3 Hours Total
> Time
> Cables for your rotary installation -
>
http://www.roblinphoto.com/shop/
>
> Dang! I was just about to go over there and take
> some pictures
> of Bob's airplane. I have never been a fan of tail
> dragger's.
> I think they add to the hazards of aviation. They
> are fundamentally
> unstable on the ground. The CG is behind the main
> wheels. Therefore
> there are situation where they are impossible to
> control no matter
> how good the pilot.
>
> --
> Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.
A tail dragger is flown until it is in the chocks.
Karibian
----------------------------------------------------------
Karibian is right. But aren't you suppose to do that with all
planes. My training was in a conventionally geared Luscombe 8A
(1956-8). I always thought was easy to handle (Not, according to
some Pilot Reports). Fact is, I have never flown (PIC) in a
tricycle gear so I can't really comment on the difference in
handling. Do I need to get an endorsement if I do?
Joel
The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site.
http://www.rotaryeng.net
Copyright 1998-2006 All world wide rights reserved.