> Hi Paul,
> I'm enjoying following along with your current threads!!
> Hope you don't mind me chiming in here again to ask another newbie
> question:
>
> I've been slowly acquiring S5 NT (9.7 : 1) rotors for my 20B NA
project
> (much cheaper that RX8 rotors). I had 2, and just received the
3rd one
> today. I've been trying to be careful to make sure I get
rotors with
> matching weight code stamps, but the one I got today is
different. Can
> you help here? I hope you don't mind me including pictures!! I
tried
> to make the files small. The first 2 pics are the rotors I
already had,
> and they show a "C" along side another weird symbol (kinda looks
like
> a 7).
>
> The next pic is the rotor I got today. It shows a "C" along
side an
> "E" :
> My question is.......Is it OK to use all these rotors
together? Are
> these all S5 (9.7 : 1) rotors? Is this last rotor a weight code
"C" or
> "E" ? What's the other symbol of Letter mean?
>
> Thanks again for all your help and knowledge!!
> Don
>
> From what I gather you can't mix and match weight codes.
> I think you need to have it balanced by an experienced
> rotary engine balancer. The rotors must be balanced
> about their center point and matched with all the other rotors
> for weight and then the counter weights adjusted
> for the exact weight of the rotors. There is a guy here in
> So Cal that does it.
>
> Rotor weight codes.
> The only thing I can find is this.
> http://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?p=1309602#post1309602-
>
> I'll forward this to Jim Mederer. Hopefully he will have time
> to help as he gets the really hard questions :)
>
> Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.
Hi Don;
These all appear to "C" weight rotors. For a 2-rotor, letter
codes must
be adjacent,
e.g. B/C, D/E, C/D are OK (A/C, B/D are NOT)
The rotors themselves are balanced about their centers at the
factory.
I am not sure what the balance requirements are for a 3-rotor.
I believe the backwards "E" and other characters are Japanese - don't
know what they mean.
Theoretically, the S5 rotors weigh the same as the 20B rotors, and
you
"should"?
be able to use the 20B front and rear counterweight without
rebalancing.
I posted some rotor/balance info a few weeks ago.
The S5 rotor faces are machined, the S4 have a rough cast appearance.
You could also measure the depth of the combustion area.
See attached file
-> might be worth adding to the website. I don't have any turbo
stuff.
A couple of housing comparisons might be useful as well, I'll see
what I
can scare up...
When mixing and matching parts for higher than stock rpm, a custom
balance is not a bad idea.
Cheers
Cary
Thanks Cary,
This is what I have:
All are machined faces.
Thanks,
Don
Hi Don;
The S5 NA rotors are at a bit of a premium for racing and higher
activities :)
Worth a quick depth check on the rotor recesses to ensure they are all
the same.
Personally, I would run the stock 9.0? 20b rotors in NA mode for the
5-8% HP loss.
If you have the room under the cowl - you could re-add a turbo later.
Just curious, what is your project?
(Sorry if I've missed it, I don't read all the emails)
Cheers
Cary
The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site.
http://www.rotaryeng.net
Copyright 1998-2006 All world wide rights reserved.