Matt recommends the following Barnstormers classified ad (click on link)
http://www.barnstormers.com/listing.php?id=163391
Paul, a perfect testbed project for a 13B - airframe does well on
150-230hp AC engines
AOL users, use this link:
<a href=
"http://www.barnstormers.com/listing.php?id=163391">
http://www.barnstormers.com/listing.php?id=163391</a>
I love those old Stinsons but the problem is the FAA will balk
at a certified airplane with a rotary in it. I am also too old
to restore anything. I would die long before it was done :)
Perhaps if somebody metalized the wings they could claim
it was an experimental.
--
Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.
Already has metalized wings. This would be useful as a testbed.. Not
as a personal airplane. The FAA would have no trouble allowing the
airplane to be operated as a test aircraft under an experimental
airworthiness certificate. That would mean that you could operate the
airplane for test purposes - just like Francois' Arrow. It might be
tough to take the plane on a cross-country without a bunch of paperwork,
but I don't have a real problem with that.
Doesn't need a resto as long as it's not bent or corroded badly. Shoot
a coat of paint on it and add some vinyl N-numbers on it and test away.
It's got a rugged, easily repairable airframe, and lands slow, and for a
tailwheel airplane, it has excellent manners. Nobody would expect much
performance out of it so when you go out and spank the aircooled powered
Stinsons, people will notice..
Matt-
I am considering selling the 182 and buying a good flying airplane,
taking out the engine and installing a rotary.
But something faster than a Stinson.
Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.
The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site.
http://www.rotaryeng.net
Copyright 1998-2006 All world wide rights reserved.