Subject: Swiss Mufflers
From: Rotary Engine
Date: 6/29/2007, 10:53 AM
To: AARotary Engine



    >> After searching through many salvage yards looking for a
   radiator that
    >> would fit under the engine in the RV-9A, I finally found one. It
   is in
    >> my 2005 Dodge Hemi PU! By turning it 90 degrees and moving the
   exhaust
    >> pipe a little it fits just fine, at least in the 3D. JPGs are
   attached
    >> showing the arrangement. The muffler shown will not be used.
   Instead I
    >> plan on a QUIET muffler under the fuse.
    >>
    >> The rad core dimensions are 24" X 14" X 1.75" and the red boxes
   at the
    >> end are the tanks, each 1.5 W X 3" H. We plan to weld custom
   tanks on
    >> with the hose barbs on the firewall end. This produces a core
   volume of
    >> 588 cu. in.
    >>
    >> A couple of questions.
    >>
    >> 1. What do I do about the different lengths of the rad and the oil
    >> cooler to avoid a discontinuity, if anything?
    >>
    >> 2. How and where do I join the two exhaust pipes for max.
   efficiency?
    >>
    >> I heard that the Swiss builders invented their own muffler. Is
   this a
    >> good muffler and if so, are the plans available?
    >>
    >> I really hope I can avoid paying over $400 for a racing rad.
    >>
    >> Doc Custer
    >> Retired Software Engineer and sometime Audiologist
    >>
    >> Nice 3D's Doc.
    >> No solution for the first question :) All aluminum racing rads
   are $200
    >> in
    >> the Summit catalog. I bought a Howe. If yours has plastic tanks
   beware.
    >> Have somebody weld up aluminum tanks. Bad place to save money.
    >>
    >> Join the pipes at 32 inches. Careful on the muffler.
    >> Most don't hold up. Tracy found one that seems to hold up.
    >> Last picture. I think it is a Flow Master from Warshawsky or
   some such.
    >> Anyway top and bottom are pressed steel and welded together around
    >> the sides.
    >> --
    >> Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.
    >
    > If needed we will weld on AL tanks.
    >
    > Has anybody tested the plastic tanks to, say, 100 psi? If not, we
   will. If
    > doing this yourself, be careful: fill the rad with water as full
   as you
    > can
    > get it and then carefully add air pressure. Air can result in
   explosive
    > decompression if the rad fails. Water only squirts.
    >
    > In any event we need to move the inlet and outlets and fill/rad cap
    > location, so will probably have to weld on AL tanks to get the
   desired
    > locations. I would like to know how strong a salvaged rad is,
   regardless.
    > Especially the core as the tanks can easily be replaced.
    >
    > One more word of caution: each rad probably has a different
   strength. Test
    > before installing.
    >
    > I think I will do a 3D of the diffuser, rad and oil cooler. That
   will ease
    > the making of a male mold.
    >
    > Doc Custer
    > Retired Software Engineer and sometime Audiologist
    >
    > My experience is plastic tanks gets old, brittle and crack. Recent
    > information
    > suggest there is something in the antifreeze that makes them brittle.
    > As far as I know we have never had a rad split due to pressure so
   far. Of
    > course
    > the pressure is limited to 30 psi. I cannot say that about oil
    > coolers however as rotary engine oil coolers are subjected to up
   to 150
    > psi.
    >
    > Consider a two pass rad to get the inlet and the outlet on the
    > same end. Eases the plumbing.
    >
    > Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.

   Although you can't see the inlet and outlet, the radiator is a cross
   flow.
   This means that both hoses could be on the after portion of the
   tanks with
   some loss of efficiency, I suppose.

   I checked Summit Racing. Their search engine couldn't find a two
   pass rad.
   Or counter flow or any thing I could think of to call it. They do
   have some
   nice rads for under $200 though.

   Doc Custer
   Retired Software Engineer and sometime Audiologist

   Two pass rads are interesting. The flow length is twice as long
   but the flow area is half as much. In one regard they are less efficient
   and in another more efficient. In theory for a given over all flow
   the velocity
   in the tubes is higher which is a positive thing. On the other hand
   the all important temperature difference is lower on average I think.
   Also since the resistance of the rad is higher the flow rate may be
   lower
   with a given pump. To quote Kays and London:

   "In the design of liquid-to-liquid heat exchangers, accurate knowledge
   of the friction characteristics of the heat transfer surface is
   relatively
   unimportant because of the low power requirement for pumping
   high-density fluids."

   Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.

Tony Bingelis's book, "Firewall Forward" has a section on "Swiss"
mufflers. The muffler consists of a tube rolled out of SS mesh
surrounded by glass mesh (SS mesh would be better for our application,
glass would not last) inside of a section metal tubing about 3-4 inches
in diameter. The longer the muffler, the quieter  I guess it would be. I
don't think anyone has tried this on a rotary engine.

Brian Trubee

Yes they have and it burned out shortly as I recall :)

Paul Lamar

The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://www.rotaryeng.net
Copyright 1998-2006 All world wide rights reserved.