Subject: Rotary engine exhaust system
From: Rotary Engine
Date: 9/5/2007, 7:23 PM
To: AARotary Engine





This type of exhaust and intake were used very successfully on a custom
built engine for a FSAE car. I haven't seen it on anything else till you
guys talked about it. I figured I show this to you in case there was
something to be gleaned from it.

*/Rotary Engine <rotaryeng@earthlink.net>/* wrote:


     >>>> Dear Mr Lamar,
     >>>>
     >>>> My name is Pierre Terblanche and I am a product / automotive
    designer.
     >>>> First can I say that the Chaparral cars were some of the
    objects of
     >>>> wonder of my youth.
     >>>>
     >>>> I am working on a Wankel engined project in my spare time (A
    hobby...)
     >>>> as I have always been a fan of the rotary engine. When I was
    in college
     >>>> in South Africa in the early 70s my
     >>>> roommate raced a Mazda RX2 in production racing.These cars were
     >>>> extremely fast and bulletproof.
     >>>>
     >>>> I had forgotten about the Wankel until I saw a small go-kart
    engine at
     >>>> the Birmingham race car show. After years of working with four
    stroke
     >>>> engined bikes the motor appealed to me as it is lightweight,
    compact,
     >>>> vibrationless. ( 52ps x 16kg.)
     >>>>
     >>>> It is clear to me that there are issues with the engine as far as
     >>>> emissions and noise
     >>>> is concerned but for a track day bike this will not be an issue.
     >>>>
     >>>> I found an article on the Internet about a conceptual exhaust
    system
     >>>> for
     >>>> Wankel engines which you have designed.This was the one with the
     >>>> cylindrical drum main body. Based on Russian research..?
     >>>>
     >>>> Would it be possible for you to let me have some more
    information as to
     >>>> the potential advantages of such a system. ( Compact light weight
     >>>> etc....? )
     >>>>
     >>>> Yours Truly,
     >>>>
     >>>> Pierre Terblanche.
     >>>>
     >>>> I purchased your book "How to Cool Your Wankel" when I was in
    the USA
     >>>> recently.There are some very interesting practical ideas in
    there.
     >>>> Thank
     >>>> you very much.
     >>>>
     >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------
     >>>> Thanks you for your interest and complements.
     >>>>
     >>>> I think this is the muffler you are speaking of.
     >>>>
     >>>> Weight is going to depend on what you make it out of and how long
     >>>> you want it to last and or the duty cycle.
     >>>>
     >>>> For a continuous duty aircraft engine some parts of it will
    have to be
     >>>> made
     >>>> from
     >>>> .035" thick Inconel to keep the weight down. The rotary
    exhaust runs
     >>>> up to 1800 F on all peripheral exhaust port engines. The RX8
    engine
     >>>> has side exhaust ports and they are about 200 F cooler.
     >>>>
     >>>> --
     >>>> Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.
     >>>>
     >>>>
     >>>>
     >>>> Paul,
     >>>>
     >>>> Does that thing work? It would fit well on a helicopter,
    especially on
     >>>> a
     >>>> vertical installation. Does it work better than a turbocharger?
     >>>>
     >>>> Steve Brazil
     >>>>
     >>>> In theory it does but so far as I know nobody has built one yet.
     >>>> It is cheaper and easier in a plane to just use two pipes 32
    inches
     >>>> long and a collector. Probably would pay off in a pusher
    configuration.
     >>>> --
     >>>> Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.
     >>>
     >>> How much to build one? Who is competant to build it? I have a
    project
     >>> coming up (pusher) with a single rotor that will need an effective
     >>> compact
     >>> exhaust system. If I don't have to sell a kid, I might be
    willing to
     >>> fund
     >>> a
     >>> prototype.
     >>>
     >>> best,
     >>>
     >>> George W.
     >>
     >> The muffler on my one rotor in the picture is very effective and
    simple.
     >> Header is 1.5" going tangentially into the 4" expander and the
    aoutlet is
     >> 1". I will probabely go to 5" with the expander in the flying
    version, it
     >> is
     >> now 4" because it was available. The whole system is empty.
     >> The two factors making this exhaust work are, the expansion with the
     >> assosiated adiabatic cooling, and matching of the tail pipe size.
     >> Standing next to the engine as in the picture, without any ear
    mufflers
     >> is
     >> no problem, even for a prolonged period of time.
     >> If anyone has a standardized measuring method, I would be
    interested to
     >> take
     >> db measurements.
     >>
     >> Richard Sohn
     >> N2071U
     >
     > Lets talk, Richard. What does your exhaust system weigh?
     >
     > George W


    Sorry, George. I am not ready at this time to do any optimization on the
    exhaust. The present system is made of mild steel from the auto muffler
    shop.
    For a rough weight estimate using 35thou SS, use 16"x 1 3/4, 20"x 5, and
    12"x1 1/4 plus a couple of ounzes for welding and 8oz for the
    flange. That
    will get you close to what I am going to have on the flying version
    of the
    engine.

    Richard Sohn
    N2071U

This type of exhaust and intake were used very sucessfully on a custom
built engine for a FSAE car. I havent seen it on anything else till you
guys talked about it. I figured I show this to you incase there was
something to be gleaned from it.

Rob Woods

The pdf are too big to publish Rob but here is a screen capture.
It appears to be a simple tangential muffler which dates back at least to
prewar II VW beetles. Not a tuned muffler.

Paul Lamar

The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://www.rotaryeng.net
Copyright 1998-2006 All world wide rights reserved.