Well Sir, I finally got a few seconds to do these FEA's on your hub.
    I installed some 'ball bearings' of sorts and then a shaft/stub
    where the
    blades would sit. I loaded this stub two ways. The first was radially     out from the center w/ a 16,000 lb load. And then on a flat face which
    was 24" from center I put 325 lb's force perp to the plane of rotation.     I put symmetrical loads on either end of the hub and then used Larry's
    6061-T6 Alum material properties to test it.. 32seconds later it
    gave me these
    I think that the area where it neck's down is really the only area     which might need a little more material.. the rest looks like it could
    fly. If it was made from Alum.. that is..

    Larry also gave me some material data on composites so I did these     w/ Eglass. Now the data did not provide a yield number for the material
    so it doesn't show whether it's exceeded it , but hopefully these
    will be
    useful to you as well..

    Anyway if you want me to do any more just fire away.. it takes
    longer to copy and
    paste the screen shots than it does to do the FEA part of the job..
    Jarrett

    Thanks Jarrett. You do great work.

    Looks like it is over designed just about everywhere except the necked
    down area. Time to save some weight :) I'll go with the e-
glass results.

    --
    Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.


I think the yield strength for e-glass structures is rarely a concern -
it's so flexible that by the time you reach yield, the structure has
flexed so much that other things start going wrong.  Certainly e-glass
can be used in a particular structure where the yield strength matters,but it may be more relevant to design for stiffness..


Regards,

Matt-

I would agree in most cases. Helicopter rotor heads are unique situationswhere some flexibility is required to deal with the gyroscopic forces.
You have this big gyro up there and every time you try to pitch
or yaw  huge bending forces are introduced into the shaft. Also as the
blade moves forward on one side the lift is greatly increased while
the blade moving aft the lift is greatly decreased.  This too causes
bending moments on the blade. Mitigating all this is the centripetal
forces on the blade due to their own weight which in effect tends
to keep them flat while still supporting the weight of the craft.
Without this effect they are no where near strong enough to support
the weight of the helicopter.

Consequently most helicopters have what amounts to a U-joint between
the blade and the shaft. This minimizes the bending loads on the shaft.
The new thing is a semi rigid rotor head made from glass composite
that provides the flexibility required while simplifying the rotor head.Glass fiber does not fatigue.

http://www.b-domke.de/AviationImages/Rotorhead.html


Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.

When I was a kid I always wanted a helicopter.. never had the gumption to go
and do something about it.. but I could day dream.  Now, back then there
was no internet to cloud my train of thought so I set down to figure out
how to make it fly.

I understood the concept of a swash plate and how that actuated the
blades but wanted to simplify it. My plan was to use a rather large
rotor mast [in the order of 6" dia. or so] and run a control rod up through
the center of the mast. It would have a spherical plane bearing
in the center and a ball bearing at the top. The rod [ an 3" tube more likely]
would be moved in both the x and y directions at it's bottom end, it would
pivot on the sphereical plane bearing in the middle of the mast and
thereby move the top end of the rod [w/ the bearing] in the same but
opposite motion as the bottom end. The bearing at the top was
connected to the blades via linkage arms and would actuate
the blades when the center rod was moved.
The top bearing was riding on a shaft which slid in the center control
rod and would be used to adjust collective.

I'm not sure if it was less complex than current swash plate and link's
used in heli's of today or not.. maybe someday when I have time I'll build an R/C
model of it and test it..  I know the R/c heli's I used to fly were a beast to configure
and get working/tracked properly.. and all that stuff bends and wreck's easily in only
the slightest of hard landings..

Anyway, looking back I guess it wasn't such a bad day dream.. at least not for a
14 yr old kid..

Not sure if the idea applies or not.. but just wanted to tell someone about the idea..
maybe it will go somewhere.. or maybe it's already been done..

Best
Jarrett

I would love to see a 3D Jarrett sounds like it has real possibilties.