Eric,
Is that fuel burn ratio's 13.1:1 to 13.4:1 at WOT?
George (down under)
George,
13-1 at WOT is pretty close number. We will have more dyno, test
stand, and
in flight data in the coming months.
Eric Barger
I know this is probably picking nits, but I'd like everyone to think
about mixture (fuel-air) in terms %power (or best-power) instead of
throttle position (re "WOT" in this message). Throttle position -
especially on the rotary which runs well over a wide range of mixture
settings, is only a portion of the description or power output.
WOT should be thought of as "best volumetric efficiency" not "best
power" - though best power generally happens at WOT.
So, it sounds like Eric is saying that he sees his engines making best
power at mixtures around 13:1.
Side question Eric: Does your engine test setup allow easy inflight
setting/adjustment/control of the fuel-air mixture? As has been
discussed here in the past, this is critical for optimizing engine
performance (efficiency) lacking some kind of really smart FADEC system.
Regards,
Matt-
Matt,
I agree, I asked the question as I thought best power for the rotary was
12.65:1.
I intend running a carb with a wide band O2 sensor and a digital display
monitor/readout.
No good having a leaning knob, unless you can see what the fuel air ratio
is - my opinion only FWIW.
George (down under)
Matt,
Good input as it relates to VE and WOT. We tune our ECU using VE correction
with a desired lambda as a base map. Our ECU has an external Barometric
sensor allowing for altitude comp without having to do any in flight
adjustments. One note about A/F mixture in a charged cooled rotary engine
the incoming A/F is cooling the rotor so you use this to provide cooling as
well as desired and or optimum power. This is one variable we have that is
not in the Mazda rotary due to the oil cooling.
Eric Barger
The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site.
http://www.rotaryeng.net
Copyright 1998-2006 All world wide rights reserved.