Subject: Vertical installation
From: Rotary Engine
Date: 10/18/2007, 9:03 PM
To: AARotary Engine


        Hello Guys , I have one question regarding a vertical
        installation.
        If I isolate the oil circuit with a sump pump and have
        the oil tank separated from the engine.
        Do you think It would create problem for the engine to
        run?

        Thank you

        Frank

        Sustained vertical operation.
        I can't say for sure because I have never seen this done.
        I am also sure the devil is in the details so it depends
        on how well the scavenging system is designed. You would be on
        the bleeding edge. You will probably need a scavenge
        pump to extract the oil from behind the rear main bearing.
        If you don't do this the rear main bearing might overheat.

        The other major problem might be... you may not get oil flowing
        out of
        the lower rotor. The rotor may merely fill up with oil allowing
        no cool oil to flow in. Effective rotor cooling depends on a
        constant flow
        of cool oil. Therefore the oil cooling of the lower rotor
        may not function.

        You won't know all this until you try.
        It would be safer to use a bevel gear box and run the
        engine as Mazda designed it to run.

        In VTOL use vertical operations are used for only a few seconds
        while
        landing and taking off.

        Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.


        Paul,

        You've said it at least once before, but I think expecting VTOL
   to not
        spend much time hovering is unrealistic. Before I'd consider
   flying it,
        I'd want to hover the thing for several hours - just to figure out
        how.. And then, people are going to hover taxi from where they
   start up
        to a safe location from which to depart. Vertical departures
   from the
        tie down are going to blow the neighbors around -
        unpopular. Finally, I
        wonder about the approach method. Do you expect that a normal
   approach
        will be flown (with a traffic pattern)? In what configuration?
        Translation from wing lifting to rotor lifting at low speed
   close to the
        ground? The Ospreys transition from forward configuration to
   vertical
        while still on the downwind - was watching them at Kirtland AFB
   a couple
        of weeks ago..


        Regards,

        Matt-


        Thanks Matt.

        Testing is another matter. One might have to limit the time one
   tests
        in the vertical mode to insure the engine does not over heat.

        If it is a heliopad vertical departures from the tie down
   blowing the
        neighbors around is normal. You can not taxi a skid helicopter
   with out
        first lifting off.

        I envision a normal high angle of attack approach with a complete
        transition
        to vertical on short final. A modified flare if you will. Previous
        delta wing
        airplanes approached at a high angles of attack anyway. Lacking
        adequate thrust
        and control they could and did get in the back side of the power
        curve mode
        which generally resulted in a crash. Particularly the jet powered
        deltas
        as they had little or no roll control. They had no prop wash over
        the tail.

        We have the thrust and we have the pitch control at angles of
   attack all
        the way up to 90 degrees. Roll control is provided by both the
        variable thrust vector angles (both lateral and fore and aft)
        and the prop wash over the elevons.

        The V22 Osprey was sold as both a helicopter AND a normal airplane.

        I think that is unrealistic for what I have in mind. Super
   efficient
        high speed cross country travel with VTOL only. It is not an
   adequate
        helicopter IMHO.
        --
        Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.

        Okay Paul, fair enough..

        I'd be interested in seeing a scale model fly. One without any
   gyro
        help (which the RC helicopters use).


        Regards,

        Matt-

        Perry might be working on one.
        --
        Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.

   Yes, I am going to build one. I still need a 1/4 to 1/5 scale planetary
   gear set.
   I have a file P-1603-BG_cat-Gearhead-pg29-34.pdf
   I think you sent that out? PL5 series, which model do you think would be
   best?

   Perry

   Are we using a model rotary engine to drive it? :)
   http://www.osaka-asia.org/en/companies/nitto-kosakusyo/
   Not much on the web site

   I would go with the PL5050 at 1.32 pounds weight. 10:1 ratio.
   Max allowable out put torque would be 14 Nm or 10 foot pounds.

   My guess is the Nitto rotary is  2 HP at 20,000 RPM

   Torque is then

   HP = Torque x RPM/ 5252

   2 * 5252/ 20,000 = Torque .525 foot pound.

   10:1 ratio is about right so 5.252 foot pounds max coming out of the
   gear box at 2000 RPM. Hard to say what the static trust is.

   I am guessing on the HP of the Nitto. So far I have not been
   able to find out what it is.

   Well I would be surprised if the torque out of the engine was
   more than 2 foot pounds.

   Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.


Why kill yourself with a gas engine?  Use an electric motor designed to
run in an RC chopper..

This page references one with counter rotating blades.

http://www.rc-airplane-world.com/electric-rc-helicopters.html

They must already have a gearbox..


Regards,

Matt-


The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://www.rotaryeng.net
Copyright 1998-2007 All world wide rights reserved.