I don't know what you guys are smoking but I don't see how A is more compact
than B.

Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.

Paul,
Very good point!
A is more compact than a round opening sliding over  a round opening.

Although B is shorter than A is doesn't give sufficient room for the
bearings spread that I wanted - but more importantly the opening is far less
linier, in that it opens to the widest part (centre) in a linier fashion (
incrementally), but then the 'additional- after centre' area starts to
decrease ( incrementally) until it reaches the back of the opening.

This is more difficult to match fuel flow to, and is what I refer to as less
linier opening.

The half round slide over a round opening gives the shortest slide with the
most linier opening.  The only thing better than this is a square slide over
a square opening. Next best is a round hole over a round opening ( given it
will take up more room), because the round hole in the slide actually
reduces any surrounding space to zero as the opening is fully open (WOT).

That's the best I can explain it Paul.
George ( down under)


The last thing is what you want. A round hole in the slide with a round
opening. An aircraft engine spends over 90% to 95% of the time at WOT
and that gives the smoothest runner walls when WOT.

Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.

Paul,
I accept your argument, you may well be right, especially considering the
thicker slide that I'm using - who knows what turbulence is involved. The
problem is that I wouldn't be able to use either the round needle or the
flat ground needle as the needle needs to recess into a jet at the bottom of
the round opening - can't do it with that configuration you suggest.

As usual the design is a trade-off considering what is available to us and
what the individual considers most important. As this design is in current
use with the Aero carb, I feel confident it will work well enough.

There is also an additional configuration that is available to us and that's
the opposite to A., which is even better than B - it has very little
surrounding area and you can still use a needle, but it would have to be
elongated at the top to accommodate bearings. The incremental opening would
also be greater at the critical low RPM levels ( i.e less control at idle
levels).
Sorry to be so boring!
George (down under)


Yes that is true about the needle and all the Mikuni and other similar carbs have
the same problem. I have a new appreciation of the problems carb have on tuned
manifolds after our recent bad experience with the Weber. I suspect most carb are
not used on tuned manifolds so you could be in for a surprise or two. You won't
know until you try it.

As far as linearity is concerned I doubt seriously you will notice the difference
among the various designs as the load on an aircraft engine with a fixed pitch
prop is highly non-linear.

If I were doing a single throat carb I would do it this way.
It is perfectly smooth inside when WOT. The most important configuration.

BTW why did you not use solid Teflon for the slide? It eliminates the needs
for bearings.

Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.

The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://www.rotaryeng.net
Copyright 1998-2007 All world wide rights reserved.