The heat flow path from combustion chamber to the rotor
bearing and then on to the e-shaft is very short in Wankel
engines. See the attached jpg.s. The rotor combustion
chamber surface runs up to 500 F. This heat transfer
path must be blocked or the rotor cooled to prevent
the rotor bearing and e-shaft from over heating.
The rotor bearing integrity is key to the maximum RPM
of any Wankel engine. Since HP is a direct function of RPM
the power to weight ratio of a rotary is also a function
of the maximum RPM the engine can achieve.
The current oil cooled rotor Mazda engine is limited to about
11,000 RPM in racing and about 9,000 RPM street.
It seems to me this problem or feature needs to be addressed
in future rotary engine designs. SAE paper 900035 addresses this issue
for charged cooled (CCR) rotaries but it may be applicably to
oil cooled (OCR) rotor Wankel engines such as the Mazda as well.
http://www.rotaryeng.net/
"Down load tech paper on charged cooled Rotamax type rotary engines."
What this SAE paper suggest is making the e-shaft hollow and cooling
the rotor bearing area from within the e-shaft by oil or glycol/water
coolant. How this is achieved is through relatively new technology
called hydro-forming. The frame rails on a Corvette are hydro-formed.
It has the potential for cutting the cost of the e-shaft as well.
A length of 4340 steel tube is placed in a very strong female mold
and super high pressure is applied. A hardenable steel alloy is chosen
as the hardness of the rotor bearing e-shaft surface is critical.
The wall thickness of the tube could be pre-machined to better control
the wall thickness of the final product. FEA or Finite Element Analysis
would be used to determine the wall stresses so local wall thickness can
be tailored to equalize the stress and minimize the weight
and maximize the heat transfer to the coolant.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydroforming-
Something as simple as a glorified fire cracker placed in the tube
could also do the job. US coins are made by explosively bonding
dissimilar metals.
Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.
Paul,
I was also curious to your opinion of the charge cooled engine. I have
seen you neither dismiss or praise that particular method. I can see the
mechanical benifits of parts simplification but what about emissions,
and throttlability,etc?
Rob
Emissions are of no consequence as charge cooling will never be used
in a car engine.
Charge cooling has manufacturing cost advantages.
Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.
The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site.
http://www.rotaryeng.net
Copyright 1998-2007 All world wide rights reserved.