I am not sure which Zenith this is then. The 801 is the high wing
STOL
right?
This may be for the ZODIAC XL/601. Somebody said all Zeniths were
the same
firewall.
No problem changing it. Notice this is for a one rotor LSA. Are
you using a
two rotor?
I dwgs are preliminary so I was planning on using that top center
hard point
for the rear motor mount using a strut arrangement similar to this.
The rad may fit under the engine. Two rotors require a rad about
600 cubic
inches no more than 2 inches thick. That implies a rad core about
18" by 18"
Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.
Well, No I didn't say all Zeniths shared the same firewall, what I
said was
that the CH-640, and the CH-801 Stol shared the same firewall (as
well as
the certified AMD 2000). The only difference from 801 to 640 is
the top
center reinforce present on the 801. The 640 being a low wing
design doesn't
have this feature. I hope that I have cleared up the confusion.
I have no information on the 601 or 701. they may share the same
firewall
design between each other, or not.
C. Smith
CH-640 builder
One needs a menu to keep track of all these numbers :)
What is the difference between a 701 and an 801?
--------------------------------------------------------------
I don't see any top center upper hard points on these two Exploded
Views
of the 801. I just got these off the Zenith web site.
--
Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.
Here is a picture of a Rotax engine mount for the 701. Use same hard
points for RotaMax. I think the 801 is the same only larger.
Jerry
Which one do we need first. So the 701 has the upper hard points.
Ok what are you going to build next? Twin Rotamax or single Rotamax?
--
Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.
How many ways can I say it. The 801 is the one. It will be powered
by a Renensis. Later, please do a 701 RotaMax for me.
Jerry.
OK
Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.
The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site.
http://www.rotaryeng.net
Copyright 1998-2007 All world wide rights reserved.