Subject: F1 Rocket engine mount
From: Rotary Engine
Date: 6/5/2008, 12:11 PM
To: AAA Put this in the To box


            Paul,
            What would you recommend for a conversion from the 540
           engine /   gear
            mount to a 2 or 3 rotor turboed mount for the F1 Rocket?
            Possibly use a
            secondary mount ( ala Tracy Crooks original RV4 )  although
           a   little
            heavier?
            The mount has already been drilled and is presently on the
           bird and
            waiting for a 540 or the switch to rotary.

            Also, would it be possible to have the radiator and oil
           cooler   EXITing
            air out a left side duct with the turbo heat and exhaust for
            better efficiency?  (Fuel lines at the bottom center of
           firewall.)

            Thanks,
            David Deffner
            ps. I enjoy my rotary time on the ground in SCCA and NASA
           events.


            Tracy has moved away from that type of mount as it is more
             expensive
            to build and heavier than a simple mount that uses the
           firewall   hard
            points.
            If you send me a sketch with dims of the firewall hard
           points I   will
            design a mount for
            you. Also send the thrust line height dimensions and off
           set angles
            if any. I will also need to length of the cowl from
            firewall to prop flange opening. Pictures would also help.


            It is possible to let the cooling air out the left side but
           it is
            not as efficient
            as letting it out the bottom or the right side. Obstruction
           to the
            exit air from
            the heat exchangers is not a good thing. That is not to say
           louvers
            on the left side are not a good idea to cool the turbo.
           They are.

            Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.

           Paul,
           You're very gracious and I will take you up on your
           designing a mount
           before you change your mind.  Until I have a chance to get
           you all   those
           dimensions, more  pics than you probably want to see are
           available on
           Vince Fraziers site www.vincesrocket.com
           <http://www.vincesrocket.com/>
           <http://www.vincesrocket.com/>   and
           F1 Rocket www.teamaircraft.com
           <http://www.teamaircraft.com/> <http://www.teamaircraft.com/>
           Do you have a fax number I can send the sketch and dims to?
            Some of
           that Hi Teck stuf hasn't made to some parts of Texas yet.
           V. Fraziers is a Harmon Rocket II with some of the F1 parts
           such  as  the
           cowl.

           Space is about the same as Tracy C. RV8 3 rotor, but with
           the gear
           sockets crowded in there.

           On building up a 3 rotor, does a true 3 housing have two or
           four   exhaust
           port studs?  And is there enuf material to drill and
           helicoil four   studs
           per port on a 2 rotor housing?
           I don't like exhaust leaks!!  I recall some of the racing 3
           and 4   rotor
           motors having some trouble with exhaust leaks?
           Thanks again,
           David

           No fax but you can mail it to me at:

           830 East Santa Maria St.
           Suite 303  <<<<<<<<<<< very important
           Santa Paula
           California
           93060


           All three rotor engines had the 2 stud arrangement just like
           the 2   rotor.
           In fact they used the same rotor housings I think.

           Yes there is enough meat to drill and helicoil.

           What we do with the landing gear type motor mounts is cut
           away the
           tubes we don't use and keep the rest. Cheaper and quicker.

           Here are some pictures of a mount that Jerry Hey built.

           Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor.


        Just one correction, Paul.  I did only one engine mount by cutting
       up an existing mount.  I did not like it at all and would not go
       down
       that path again.   The mount you have pictured was made from
       scratch.
       Jerry


       What was the problem? The time it took to grind off the remains
       of  the cut tubes?
       I can see how that could take some time.

       Paul Lamar


   Grinding of the remains of the cut tubes is a problem because a bit of
   the original tube must be  left  as grinding into the parent material
   is not acceptable.   So we are left with little stubs pointing in the
   wrong direction and in the way when it comes to positioning the new
   tubes.  If the Rocket uses RV4 gear mounts, then it would be better to
   start over but if a gear mount is not available there may be no choice
   but to use the old mount as you have suggested.

   BTW, I don't feel it is damaging to completely grind away the remains
   of the cut tubes off of the gear sockets.  That material is plenty
   heavy.  But it is "traditionally" not done. Perhaps the owner could do
   that part and send me the gear mount ready to go.    Jerry


Jerry, the F1 has heavier gear sockets than the RV4 to handle the 540,
and longer, and titanium legs.  There was one instance of a gear socket
splitting, due I believe to an aircraft carrier type of landing.  And
possibly the legs were not seated into the sockets properly.  That was
only one occurrence.  However, there was a mod for whoever wanted to
reinforce the sockets by welding tubing, split in half lengthwise over
the existing socket.
Did you already build a rotary mount for an F1 driver?  Got an email for
him?
Thanks,  David in Tx


The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://www.rotaryeng.net
Youtube key word UTUBPLEASE
Copyright 1998-2008 All world wide rights reserved.