> Scroll down for new additional messages.
>
>> Hello Paul
>>
>> I am happy to have met you in Oxford and enjoyed talking with you.
>> I also just went through your website and enjoyed it very much too.
>> I like your copyright statements :-)
>> But ehhh... How about ?????????? ?????????? ?
>>
>> And then for the humorists note of today a saying from Karl Lagerfeld
,
>> a German living in France
>> /The reason American cars don't sell anymore is that they have
forgotten
>> how to design the American Dream.
>> What does it matter if you buy a car today or six months from now,
>> because cars are not beautiful.
>> That's why the American auto industry is in trouble: no design, no
desire.
>> /
>> Very true today.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Randolph
>>
>> --
>> =====================================================================
>> Randolph Toom
>> Managing Director
>> heat2power SARL
>> 7 Rue Adolphe Focillon
>> 75014 Paris
>> Telephone : +339 5174 7268
>> Mobile : +336 1103 4127
>> Fax : +318 7784 5560
>> Email :
r.toom@heat2power.net
>> Web :
www.heat2power.net
>> VCard :
http://www.heat2power.net/vcards/Randolph_Toom.vcf
>> ====================================================================
>>
>>
>> This is typical of the response I received from the engineers
attending
>> the
>> symposium.
>> They immediately understood the advantages of turbo compounding and
jumped
>> on it.
>> I would not be a bit surprised if Porsche, Renault and Audi have not
>> already
>> started work.
>> Those are the three engine R&D types I know about that attended
the
>> symposium. You could see
>> light bulbs lighting up on faces all over the place.
>>
>> This reminds me of the enthusiastic response the Wright brothers
received
>> in
>> Europe compared to
>> the tepid response they received in the U.S.. Europeans tend to be
more
>> receptive to innovation.
>> I can't figure it out. Are Europeans better educated in technical
matters?
>> I can see they have a lot more to gain as the price of fuel in Europe
is a
>> lot higher than
>> it is in the US.
>>
>> I am now working on a turbo compound article to submit to Race Tech
>> magazine.
>>
>> Paul Lamar
>>
>>
>> Paul,
>>
>> The main problem is inherent with many (not all) of our higher
education
>> institutions. You take a new kid, send him through 4 to 8 years of
>> college,
>> then hire him and give him a job designing an engine mount for a new
car.
>> The kid has never even worked on his own car, let alone worked in a
dealer
>> service department as a tech or on the assembly line putting things
>> together. He may not even be sure which end of a screwdriver to use.
And
>> we
>> expect him to have the insight to be able to design a part that not
only
>> functions well, but is easy to service. The problem is he doesn't
have the
>> practical background to fall back on.
>> I firmly believe that our education system needs to change. The intern
>> program is very short sided.
>> If you want to be an Automotive Engineer, do your first 2 years
getting
>> your
>> general education stuff and some preliminary engineering classes. Then
go
>> spend a year or two in the trenches of repair, manufacturing and even
>> racing. Now go back to school and finish the engineering degree. All
of a
>> sudden you have engineers who are thinking and relating to what the
class
>> is
>> all about, instead of trying to find the next beer party.....
>> Do the same thing for Aerospace, Electronics....
>> Just my 2 cents,
>> Larry
>>
>> I agree Larry. I started working on dirt track race cars when I was 12
>> years old.
>> Here are some shots of the facilitates that Brookes U here in Oxford
uses
>> to train
>> race car engineers. That includes four complete sound proof dyno rooms
and
>> a four
>> poster car shaker. They are in the process of adding a wind tunnel. I
>> might add
>> that this has paid off handsomely because Brit engineers dominate
>> world wide car racing organizations and that includes Ferrari.
>>
>>
>> Paul Lamar
>
>
>
> Larry, Paul,
>
> It seems Japan Inc. recognize this as well, because the real training
> starts when the newbie enters the company.
>
> " A recent graduate of a MIT made his appearance at the corporate
> office and upon meeting the president received a mop with the
> instructions to clean the hallway floor. He complained "I can't
do
> this work, I was hired as an engineer." "Right," says
the
> president, "I forgot... you are a college grad." "Let me
show you
> how."
>
> One thought on turbo compounding and dynamic energy recovery. Why not do
> both? The race car
> would have some lower BSFC and/or power merits on the straights and
> coming out of curves but the T.C system does nothing to recover energy
> upon braking. Looking at the compound rotary turbine and its connected
> mass as a flywheel however, then perhaps braking could accelerate it
> even more.
>
> The flywheel becomes the energy source and braking and a downsized
> computer controlled engine the power sources. Brake wear is almost
> eliminated, engine is way downsized and
> run at its most efficient speed. The connection to the flywheel/turbine
> from the engine could be mechanical with an over running clutch.
>
> And what would be the connection between the wheels and the flywheel?
>
> Hydraulics or electric? My bet would be on electric in-wheel motors.
> The race car is a complicated study in total efficiency and not the
> least of the challenges is overcoming air resistance, and maintaining
> traction. In-the-wheel air cooled motors are a big plus for delivering
> power and weight exactly were it is needed. Yes wire efficiency is not
> as great as direct mechanical shaft connection but the car is not
> battery powered, it is flywheel powered.
>
> Doug in Japan
Adding unsprung weight is horrible for vehicle handling in bumps. Big
hp electric motors are very heavy compared to light weight race
wheels/tires. I think there's some multiplier that's commonly used
for the evaluating the cost of unsprung weight - like 3:1
unsprung:sprung. I suppose brakes could be made somewhat
lighter/smaller if the motor reliability is good enough. I don't know
what the offset would be.
And then, you propose using another electric motor to transfer energy
to-from the flywheel?
Haven't we had this conversation?
Matt-
Why put the electric motors at the wheels- make them sprung weight by
putting them inboard and using drive shafts like we do now with gasoling
motors.
Brian Trubee
--
The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site.
http://www.rotaryeng.net
Youtube key word UTUBPLEASE
Copyright 1998-2008 All world wide rights reserved.