Hey guys here comes your dream 55 HP one rotor motor.
Can a two rotor be far behind? I am so happy to see they
have come around to selling this great little engine.
Thank you Chris Dries.
http://www.austroengine.at/products/rotary-engines/rotary-engines.html
"Since launching our first line of products, the AE50R series, our 50
horsepower
rotary engine product,has built a successful track record, with more
than 700
installations in motor gliders and cam copters of leading OEMs. Our
rotary
engines are small, lightweight, and have an outstanding low vibration.
Their reliability and adaptability enabled the development of a
larger, stronger
rotary engine, the IAE75R, which will soon be available."
--------------------------------------------
To: Engineering at Austro Engines.
Dear Sir or Madam,
Try a longer intake manifold.
Paul Lamar
Chris,
Have you contacted Austro for a _price_ on the engine (+PSRU?)? I
surfed around their site using Bable Fish translation but found no
pricing data. Apparently you have to ask Sales for a quote. The weight
looks good and their story of test cell runs on all the engines sounds
good.
BTW, their graph of KW vs. RPM is goofy. If the KW(HP) is circa 40.2 KW
at 7200, and the torque is still going up like it shows, there is no way
the KW(HP) gets truncated to a flat limit from 7200 to 7800 rpm. It
must continue to go up also.
Joe
You are quite right Joe. I noticed that too. The torque shows still
going up and up, not likely at 7800 rpm, or if so, the power must rise too.
Does this mean we cant trust the data? It is the same old 294 cc charge
cooled engine with an added compressor.
Rolf
No compressor. That is a rotor cooling blower.
The rotor is pure air cooled and not charge cooled.
Cooling air comes in around the base of the rotor in
a part of the end housing that is not contacted by
the side seals.
The porting is straight p-port. The reason the torque is still
going up at 7800 RPM is because of the shortness of the intake
manifold. With that short of a manifold the engine is probably tuned
for over 12,000 RPM. I am guessing. With a 24 inch manifold torque
peak would be closer to 6,000 RPM and there would be more HP
at 7800 RPM. I am not guessing :)
I think there is a thermal limit on the HP and that
is why the HP curve is truncated.
IMHO an oil cooled rotor would probably solve that problem
and improve the BSFC as that cooling blower consumes HP from
the e-shaft.
Paul Lamar
--
The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site.
http://www.rotaryeng.net
Youtube key word UTUBPLEASE
Copyright 1998-2008 All world wide rights reserved.